Probably because she took issue with children being killed, even if they were Palestinians
That’s absolutely why. Shes based AF.
The people against her for it don’t see murdered Palestinian children as children, they see them as subhuman, vermin even.
Terrorism. Saying all children should have homes and not die painfully in an ethnic cleansing is terrorism.
The worst kind too, anti-semetic terrorism.
Back in March, the New York Post ran an article about Accurso calling her a “Woke brainwasher” and warning parents against the influence they were allowing into their homes.
Stay Classy Murdoch Sewer
I didn’t know Ms Rachel because my kids are grown, but this is exactly how a person with a “voice” should be using it.
Stop Israel genocide and antisemitism against the rest of the Levant Semites.
Ms Rachel is a bit of light in this dark time.
I don’t think we’re in a dark time. I think we’re in a light time. The harsh glare of fascism is beating down on us, blinding and burning us. We need darkness to keep us safe from this evil.
People like Ms. Rachel being pro-Palestine by the virtue of child welfare is an excellent example on how Communists ought to be combining the general with the particular.
You get a million Ms. Rachels politically mobilized and in your mass organization then revolution can’t be that far away…
People tend to like democracy though.
Communists love democracy so much that they believe that the working class themselves should administer the state.
That’s participatory democracy, a type of democracy which is denied by bourgeois democracy with it’s overemphasis on representative democracy.
The authoritarian left really ruined the word communist didn’t they. nothing is more communist than collective decision making.
Communism requires an anti-democratic process to transition from capitalism. It does not mean workers get a say in the means of production, merely that they (by proxy) control it. The proxy is the regime.
Well sure, we’ve had first communism, but what about second communism?