*Ad hominem*

And no, iirc your post history was no one should vote for Harris, ergo my original comment.

Um, agreed.

Keeponstalin

Noice.

Probably a shopping trip. “I’ll take these, and this, two of those, six of these and the rest on a gift certificate. Okay Vova baby? Okay. Ciao.”

That is incorrect.

Unless your definition of “real power” is “no power”. Which, would be odd.

I don’t buy that. I think there are a number of old corporate Dems who need to get the boot. But that’s all up to the Democratic voters to do.

It’s not that complicated in principle, it’s just that complicated once one is out in the real world.

They did and enough people stayed home that they lost. Again.

Is it clear that the genocide-arguments-against-Biden/Harris were completely in line with GRU propaganda efforts?

Salon, huffpo, msnbc ffs. These are the hopium sites favored by the beaten left, because actual corporate journalism collapsed under it’s own ignorance and greed a long time ago.

The NYT will trot out a hopium piece every once in awhile like rainbow-flagging-the-logo for Pride month, but it’s all clickbait.

Who are you going to vote for in the midterms? The left needs to get its shit together. Propaganda, corruption, and blatant lies are kicking our ass.

Hey, a country can dream.

It’s an attempt to keep idiots from allowing fascism to take over again.

She didn’t support this. That’s not the same thing as magically stopping it, though. Trump does support this.

Brexit was one of several military psychological operations to undermine western political power under CambridgeAnalytica / SLC.

https://www.ted.com/talks/carole_cadwalladr_this_is_what_a_digital_coup_looks_like/transcript

And yes, the russians were all in on it.

And they let trump win for this.

They did this during the Bush administration as well

Ah yes, the worst administration in the hist- . . . goddammit.

Spot on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AfD_pro-Russia_movement

English auto-translation of the original:

Secured right-wing extremism Red-red-green in Bremen wants to initiate AfD prohibition procedure

According to the Constitution Protection, the AfD is secure extremely right-wing, and now the red-red-green coalition in Bremen wants to launch a party ban procedure. SPIEGEL has a request for urgent procedure.

05.05.2025, 16.35 hrs.

AfD politicians in the Bundestag

Photo: Frederic Kern / Future Image / IMAGO

On the basis of the AfD AfD’s classification, Bremen is to advocate the swift initiation of a party ban proceeding against the AfD as “secured right-wing extremist” by

the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution at the Federal Level. The red-red-green coalition of the Hanseatic city wants to bring a corresponding application to the Bremen citizenry.

The draft on the urgent request is available to SPIEGEL, it is signed by all three parliamentary groups and was unanimously adopted by the SPD parliamentary group on Monday afternoon. The Senate is therefore to engage in talks with the new federal government and thus work towards a ban procedure.

Furthermore, Bremen, in consultation with other federal states, is to initiate a Federal Council initiative in parallel in order to apply for a ban procedure at the Federal Constitutional Court via a majority in the Federal Chamber.

“We do not want to be accused of the fact that it is too late for this at some point,” said SPD parliamentary group leader Mustafa Güngör to SPIEGEL. The basis is the classification of the AfD as “protected right-wing extreme” by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution. “At the latest, we now know assured that the AfD is threatening our freedom-democratic basic order. Our coalition in Bremen therefore does not let up and continues to push for the initiation of a ban procedure.”

The amendment to the preurgent request to the Bremen Parliament Mustafa Güngör and the SPD parliamentary group, Henrike Müller and the parliamentary group Alliance 90/The Greens, as well as Sofia Leonidakis, Nelson Janßen and the parliamentary group Die Linke have signed.

Dipshit Rubio not realizing he won’t be spared

I mean - no? But it’s kind of a moot point - if voters rally around Jill Stein at that level, they can just write her in.

That’s what the lawyers are supposed to argue. That prevents Jill Stein from saying she’s a Democrat and then suing because they didn’t give her the presidential nomination.

Bernie’s loss is seen as a direct result of DWS’s committee fuckery by most people on here. Which is not the same as it being true, it just gets a lot more attention.

It’s the case that he didn’t win enough votes. But I think it was the first time he got such good exposure for a national contest.