- 2.79K Posts
- 357 Comments
13·8 hours agohey man, I’m just trying to help you see through obvious fabricated propaganda coming from CIA fronts like the NED. But if you love the slop this much, by all means continue consuming it.
From my article linked above in the thread that you didn’t read https://altmedia.house/post/183856
The US, Israel, and the West are involved in a large scale clandestine assault against Iran. Former CIA director Mike Pompeo claimed that there were Mossad agents “walking besides” the protestors. Iranian assets of these foreign forces were caught smuggling guns, ammunition, explosives, and Starlink devices into Iran. US-aligned Kurdish separatists admitted to activating and targeting Iranian security forces during the protests. The output of “Human Rights Activists in Iran” and “International Center for Human Rights” seems in alignment with the forceful clandestine targeting of Iran and not like objective human rights work.
except there’s a whole foreign element smuggling starlink terminals, weapons, and explosives in - a whole other man, with a knife, in your stupid analogy. Bullshit.
They are manufacturing consent for war.
This is by request. Shamefully, I don’t know much of Michael Parenti, but I am very willing to learn more.
It is, HRANA is funded by the National Endowment of Democracy [https://www.en-hrana.org/articles/inner-view-human-rights-activists-iran/].
In 1991 the founding president of NED Alan Weinstein gave an interview with the Washington Post where he stated “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.” [https://archive.ph/n47Dp].
In 1995, former CIA officer Philip Agee gave an interview on the public access program Alternative Views: “Nowadays, instead of having just the CIA going around behind the scenes and trying to manipulate the process secretly… they have now a sidekick, which is this National Endowment for Democracy, NED”. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXFuB6QkeJY]
The CIA is engaged in attempting regime change in Iran.
They are manufacturing consent for war.
The Islamic Republic is under clandestine assault by the US and Israel with the help of heavily armed Kurdish infiltrators. I do not “denounce their massacre by Khamenei’s regime” because it’s unclear who is massacring and who is being massacred, and to what scale these massacres are occurring. If innocent civilians are dying it is accidental. And these accidents are occuring because the Islamic Republic is under extreme pressure from these armed infiltrators and not because of something systematically wrong with its system of government, which allows for democratic vote under clerical supervision. The United States has a similar system with democratic vote under the supervision of AIPAC.
The Islamic Republic is not against protesting. The Ayatollah recognized the initial protests as legitimate—they were in response to real economic crisis caused by US sanctions. If the US cared about Iranians, it could ease the sanctions. The problem is when these protests are co-opted by infiltrating groups with weapons.
The BBC article cites the HRANA, the NGO I mentioned in my article which is funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. Yes, they are manufacturing consent.
They are manufacturing consent for war
yes, to be clear - I do NOT agree with Tom, obviously!
Shapiro had worked at the Israeli embassy for several months in 1996, putting out Israeli talking points to Americans.
His official role was in their ‘Hasbara’ division.
hah! That’s a good way of putting it.
You are totally untrustworthy.
ASIO are only currently looking at classing two groups as hate groups (groups who have incited or promoted racial violence) - the Neo Nazis, and Hizb ut-Tahrir.
These are test cases. Enforcement obviously wont be limited to those two, it will be up to whoever has the power to designate hate groups and that more than likely will be given to a Zionist, otherwise they wouldn’t have pushed for the bill to be passed. It’s a Zionist bill.
We have just seen how the non-violent resistance group Palestine Action was jailed in Britain. The purpose of the bill is clear: to do the same thing in Australia.
The article you linked to says that the ruling that criticism of Israel is not antisemitic preceded a government policy change enshrining the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which includes criticism of Israel. So Australia’s policy has changed.
And anyways the Israel lobby needs to be discussed as well. Would talking about AIPAC count as “yelling about Jews” to you? I certainly wouldn’t trust you.
it was passed in response to the Bondi Beach killing, which Israel-lobby captured Austrailian officials blamed on pro-Palestine rhetoric. Its purpose is to crack down on that rhetoric. You are either lying or clueless.
I notice and appreciate your engagement!
Source: Eye on Palestine via Genocide Live
It brings tears to my eyes and I have trouble controlling myself…
sorry. That’s frustrating…
It really looks intentional which makes you wonder what precisely the intentions are. It could be that Bovino just wants to LARP, or it could be a sign that State Department wants to ramp up tensions.