• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      He got many non-budgetary provisions out from the Byrd rule, which is essentially enforcing the rules that allow the thin Republican majority to pass a budget.

      But the Republican Senate also made up an accounting magic trick to pretend that a several trillion dollar budget line item has no effect on the deficit. And pretended that this is now a rule because 51 senators think this is a good idea.

      Senate Democrats did virtually everything within the legislative process that they could on their own.

      House Leader Jeffries did at least delay the vote for 8 hours, 44 minutes to talk about the bill, and bring it to the afternoon news cycle instead of at 4am.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        Remove some Republicans from office via the 14th amendment.

        Lead protests. Not just parades but actual disruptive protests

        Back left wing candidates

        Use any and all procedural tricks to delay things.

        other stuff that moderators don’t like

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Remove some Republicans from office via the 14th amendment.

          Yeah, perfectly reasonable expectation… Sometimes it feels like talking to children on this site I swear.

        • nickiwest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t understand why literally every Democrat in the Senate didn’t line up to filibuster this bill. Booker’s performative filibuster was toothless. This could actually have done something to change public policy.

            • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              In my imagination there are increasingly desperate actions they could do to stop the bill from proceeding. Pull the fire alarm. Start a fire. Cover all the chairs with honey. I don’t know. I feel like if it looked like a portal to hell was about to open I would break a lot of norms and rules to stop it

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 day ago

                Apparently they’re not even allowed an open floor to talk, but Hakeem Jeffries at least took the opportunity for 08:44

                • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  That’s the house, and only because it was a bill passed back to the house, after previous passage, to review senate revisions. Otherwise they would have been allowed to debate much more if this was the first time the house had the bill.

              • chingadera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                24 hours ago

                It’s not just your imagination. Think back to the last 8 years and how much horseshit has come out that “wasn’t law” but was allowed. That same thinking and action could easily be applied by the opposition, but it turns out the opposition is a wet paper towel.

                I’m not smart enough to steer this, but there has to be a group trying to put together a legitimate third party. Let’s talk about that. Anytime theres a fucking comical issue upfront, talk about that, and don’t relent.

          • Turret3857@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            i said this the other day and got downvoted to hell, in addition to people telling me “well they did filibuster it”

            • TachyonTele@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Yes. Because it was filibustered for a day.

              “They did the thing i wanted but i said they didn’t and i don’t understand why people don’t agree with me”

              • Turret3857@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Why did it only go on a day, why didnt it go longer? There are no rules stating they can’t.

                • TachyonTele@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  You already know the reason, someone else already said why. I’m not going to get drawn into a circlejerk argument with you just because you refuse reality.

                  • j0ester@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    We all knew it was going to get passed. But if they did it for two days… Donald be crying, because he can’t sign it on the 4th. That’s what I was hoping.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            I meant more generally, so democrats can win elections and then win votes. It’s something they should have been doing for the past decade. Look at how the democratic party is treating Zohran for an example of how not to do it.

              • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                And agian, what are government moderators?

                Oh, sorry. I meant the moderators of lemmy.world. If you say anything too spicy, your comment gets removed

    • peregrin5@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Maybe next time and everytime go out and vote blue so they have even a chance of doing something to stop it.

      Elections have consequences.