You seem to think I’m complaining about something, when my words obviously don’t do anything of the sort. You’re doing this “Royal We” and acting like you’re the representative for a larger group of people, which your are not. I’m simply pointing out the flaws in your statements and trying to understand what you’re trying to to say. As others have said, you’re not making a lot of sense.
First: I’m not “complaining about trans people” in any way. I’m pointing out the flaw in your logic, and attempting to understand what mechanism you believe you are attempting to enact here because it’s no making sense.
Second: trying to contort other people’s comments to turn yourself into a victim over falsehoods is the weakest of weak discourse, and makes you seem like an unserious person. I hope you don’t engage with people in person like that, because it’s a fast track to being ignored.
Hol’up…
Where did you get the idea that “trans people are numerous enough”? Numerous in what, exactly? To swing an election?
I’m so confused by all the stuff you’re posting around here. It seems you are VERY misinformed about your position in society as a member of a group, and how that affects US elections at large.
I’m not saying to hold back on your swings or anything, but the crazy vitriol you’re spouting off just seems to say you’re making some wild assumptions that will not play out…
Look…just going to be super honest here and say a Super Minority group of maybe 1-2% making electoral threats doesn’t math out, and in the bigger picture of things happening right now only amounts to extortion, and the Gay Community at large can explain to you why this doesn’t work in great detail.
The words you posted don’t even match the tenor of the article you’ve linked, so I’m feeling this is just a misguided way of putting some bluster out there. At best, you need to side with the people trying to protect you, but in the realm of all logic you’ve apparently decided to make a threat towards them if you don’t get exactly all the things you want on your checklist.
It’s like yelling “You better give me the money, or I’m going to rob this bank here” to the cops, but you’re standing in a Wendy’s parking lot, and you have no weapons.
Lol. Better do it in the next week, buddy.
👏👏👏YES WE CAN👏👏👏
What a title
This is a right-wing rag making up bullshit talking points, y’all. Stop eating the chum.
Because they want to divide up territory with the tech bros and be governors to their own little spaces.
None of us will be getting a dollar of that money back, and we paid for it. All of it. This is an $81b windfall to corporations.
Isn’t this the same girl who was working as a Republican Operative? They didn’t clarify here, and that NYT piece was a mess.
🙄
Don’t fucking do it, gurrrrrl
What a fucking psychopath
A-DOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
I’m super glad Ted Lieu has kept up this line of questioning to keep it in the media. Needs to be said.
Comically fucking stupid.
Didn’t he threaten to leave LA if he didn’t get 51%?
Bye, Spencer.
Again…twisting someone’s words into something completely different than what was said to make whatever point you feel you need to make. Unserious.
All I asked was for clarification about HOW you imagine this mechanism of withholding votes in the numbers you’re talking about. It’s math, not attacking your social standing or worth.
Go and read about people who made serious inroads for their social causes like Harvey Milk or Barbara Gittings. That’s how you get to real social change. Hell, look at Sarah McBride. She sees the social systems for what they are, and is working inside them to affect the changes she wants to happen. Doing this argumentative bluster thing that you’re doing and just attacking people, or threatening to abstain from the existing voting system is going to do shit. That’s just the reality of it.