It was three weeks after Christmas when the bombshell letter arrived. Guy Shahar and his wife, Oksana, looked at each other in stunned disbelief.

They had followed the Guardian’s investigation into the carer’s allowance scandal that has left thousands of families with crippling debts and criminal records. Not once did they think they would join them.

“Important,” it read in big bold type. “You have been paid more carer’s allowance than you are entitled to. You now need to pay this money back”.

In some weeks, she was paid just 38p more than the threshold – but for that tiny infraction she is being forced to repay £64.60 each time, the rate of carer’s allowance at the time.

  • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    Can they do the same with rich people and corporations? Error in subsidies, pay back 100 times the amount for the infraction. Now they often get a relatively small fine.

  • perestroika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    a breach of even 1p would trigger a fine of £83.30

    Sounds extremely, extremely stupid. A breach of 1p should trigger repayment of 1p.

    Also, a person should be notified at once, at the latest next month.

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Also, why does the system even allow people to claim more than they are entitled? Is there no maximum set into the payment field or whatever they have for it?

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 minutes ago

        In my experience, it’s either total incompetence of the people in charge, or it’s malicious in order to “catch” people doing something bad.

        Like a bait car, but way more malicious since the person getting in the metaphorical car doesn’t even know it’s not their car because the keys worked, and nobody bothers stopping them for a few days so they get extra criminal charges.

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      If the punishment for deliberately claiming more in benefits than you’re entitled to is simply to repay the benefits then there’s no incentive to not do it. If you get caught then you’re no worse off than if you’d not broken the law so why not do it?

      Having said that, if the punishment for accidentally claiming more than you’re entitled to is so harsh then that is unfair.

      I’d imagine that the process for both of the scenarios is the same but it definitely should have some human element in it where intent is taken into account.

      The system should protect people from that by having proper checks before the money is paid out.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 minutes ago

        Unless your rich and break the law then the fine you a small amount relatively speaking and you made more by breaking the law.

        • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 minutes ago

          A 7 million fine for stealing 1 billion in profits.

          Just another day in late stage capitalism.

          Of course someone usually has to go to jail for something so public, so Steve from accounting is getting his “jailbird bonus” and will be admitting to fraud, and spend 4 months in a hotel cushioned cell. He also gets weekends off.

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m not a lawyer or barrister, but there are already laws against fraud, which is what you are describing. There’s a huge difference between deliberately over claiming and making a mistake, and what the article is describing is at worst honest mistakes.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Starmer is working hard to force the working poor into bankruptcy.

    Wtf is happening in the UK???

    • OwlPaste@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The same report released in May found the DWP had known since 2021 that overpayment of Carer’s Allowance has left some people in financial difficulty.

      Remind me when were last general elections again? Another conservative mine they left hanging about by sweeping it under the rug.

      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20jln81w72o

      Not a fan of labour but please give credit where its due, as to which government did nothing first.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The government currently in power is fully responsible as they could stop it entirely, they choose not to and are complicit.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          “Fully responsible” huh? Like on day 1, or is there some sort of grace period? How long does a gov have to review all historic legislation? Is your timeframe based on empiric evidence or hopes and dreams? Why aren’t the individuals who wrote and passed it “fully responsible”? Or does their culpability end the moment they vacate office?

          • Cypher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Last I checked the current UK Government have been in for nearly a year.

            They would have been aware of this legislation when it passed as it’s not like the politicians are born on election day.

            A current majority government is always responsible for how the government is running.

        • Yermaw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Bureaucracy moves pretty slowly i think. We’ve got another few years to find out for sure.