• Cimbazarov [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    Either do it or dont. US and EU only care about exploiting Greenland, and they are not going to come back with a better offer if you threaten to turn to China

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Greenland gave a huge mineral concession to a Chinese conglomerate about 20-15 years ago. The plan was to construct a huge mine staffed by Chinese workers. Greenland’s labour movement was strongarmed into exempting the Chinese workers from Greenlandic collective agreements and labour laws. From the Greenlandic point of view the mine project wasn’t ideal but it represented a hope of desperately needed economic diversification and development.

    The project eventually failed. They managed to mine a bit of metals but the challenging Greenlandic climate and geography meant that the mine was never profitable and was shut down.

    • CrawlMarks [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      In that it is resources not going to america yes. In the long run it probably outweighs thr environment concerns related to whatever happens.

    • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes and no. It is a good thing for the economic development it could bring. Greenland is severely underdeveloped, in part due to colonial mismanagement and in part due to the extreme geography of the country, and it’s significantly poorer than the rest of the Danish commonwealth.

      It also has the potential to be very bad for the arctic ecosystem that the Greenlandic people depends on for the important fisheries industry.

      In the end, the Greenlanders themselves are probably the best stewards of their nation.

    • gruvn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      I feel like folks from Greenland should be the ones to answer that.

        • gruvn@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          Hard disagree. Rampant development is bad for the environment- I get it, but the US doesn’t ask the international community which of its resources it can develop. Canada doesn’t ask the UN where it can harvest lumber. Why can you demand it of other countries?

    • sodium_nitride [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Gold mining? No. It will be used mostly as a store of value and/or as a luxury product.

      Copper mining? Eh, it seems that the world is going to need to mine huge amounts of copper to electrify. I recently attended a lecture by an environmental scientist, and he was pretty clear that there is pretty much no way around mining a huge amount of metals for transitioning the economy to clean energy*, other than de-growth, which basically no one is interested in.

      Copper is one of these minerals and is needed as a conductor. The other mentioned by the article is anorthosite (never heard of this shit before) which is apparently used for fiberglass. As it turns out, using fiberglass insulation can cut down on heating energy use.

      *That includes recycling

  • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    China: hey Greenland how’s it going? Want to make a deal that will benefit us both?

    Greenland: hmm, let me think about it.

    China: Okay!

    EU: We can’t let these guys make deals with China! We must heavily pressure them and make them fall in line!

    US: you can’t make a deal with China! I will take your country instead! Fall in line!

    Greenland: Wow, these EU and US guys suck, now I’m more inclined to make a deal with China so I don’t have to deal with them.

    And thus, the self fulfilling Chinese prophecy of “do nothing, win” completes

  • Euergetes [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    the US absolutely wants to exploit greenland’s minerals, they just want to annex the place and sit on it till it gets meltier.

    honetly this seems like baiting the US when they ought to be keeping a low profile as ole’ Don’s big brain has moved on to other concerns