Image is of demonstrators in Italy on October 3rd in solidarity with the people of Palestine as the genocide in Gaza and the West Bank continues; source is this article.


There’s way too much going on right now for me to really focus on any one country this week. The aftermath of the fall of the Nepal government has, somewhat surprisingly, reverberated around the world, and not only in countries that are enemies to the West as you’d expect; for example, Morocco’s government battle fiercely with Egypt’s and Jordan’s to be first in line to lick the dogshit off the boots of Zionists, and yet Morocco is currently embroiled in a large protest wave based primarily around a youth unemployment crisis (though their population is also remarkably pro-Palestinian, which generates additional friction). We’re also seeing similar protests in Madagascar, Peru, and Paraguay, and perhaps more will come. I’m personally fairly doubtful in the potential for meaningful economic results from these protests (the current imperialist system seems too deeply embedded for a movement that isn’t explicitly communist and anti-imperialist to alter conditions), but it is quite possible for new political results at least.

Outside of the developing world, it appears that the unpopularity of western leaders, such as in the UK, France, and Italy, is creating new levels of unrest. In Britain, the political system has become so utterly moribund that even the artificial democracy of a two-party system (more-or-less; the Lib Dems do exist I suppose) no longer suffices, with both Conservatives and Labour gradually sinking. The Reform party appears like it may become the new standard-bearer of the capitalists and petit-bourgeois - that is, the historical wellspring of fascism - and the Left Party (whatever name they eventually choose) may or may not rise to meet the occasion. In France, they’re on their fifth Prime Minister in two years, after Lecornu lasted about a month, attempting the liberal classic: promising change, and then appointing the exact same people who have ruled for the last few decades. And pro-Palestinian protests and general strikes have erupted in Italy, in defiance of their rightwing government under Meloni.

While there’s plenty of other events (e.g. continuing aggression against Venezuela that might soon erupt into a war) it would be remise of me not to mention the very much ongoing events vis-a-vis Palestine and a potential peace deal there, seemingly supported to some degree by Trump. It could be legitimate, and it could be some big act (very likely the latter, IMO). Both Trump and Netanyahu seem to believe that they’re very talented political masterminds, producing manoeuvres and feints that would make Machiavelli blush. Nothing could be further from the truth, and I trust the militant organizations inside Palestine to outplay these American failsons. Hamas and similar groups are not nearly as gullible as the Iranian reformist faction - though few people are!


Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • princeofsin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Why are Americans pretending to be mad at bill burr for going to SA when both of these countries are currently doing a genocide?

    • WilsonWilson [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      9 days ago

      Dave Chappelle has been lecturing me on freeze peach and censorship for two decades and then MBS throws a bag of money at his feet and Dave dances like a marionette. imho the real issue here is rogan sphere comedians are all hypocrites. I don’t want to hear any of them lecture me about censorship and frozen peaches again.

    • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Performative grandstanding is an American tradition, even when it makes zero sense from an American point of view

      If simply performing on Saudi government payroll is an immoral action, then one would expect the entire US government to be brought up on charges

      We would expect to see the existence of all those US military bases to become the most salient issue in this drama, with Americans demanding to know why their own government arms, funds, trains, and organizes the armed forces of the Saudi state

      Instead, we’re supposed to believe every single one of these western moral guardians are deathly concerned with the human rights of brown muslim victims of the Saudi monarchy? The premise is laughable on its face, and further proof this “issue” is defined by abstract moral grandstanding by geopolitically illiterate hypocrites and not some genuine expression of anti-monarchic leftism

      • WildWeezing420 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        The uproar is more coming from a sense of parasocial attachment to these figures, and a sense of personal betrayal, than any sort of moral grandstanding I think. We all already expect the US military to be evil and unaccountable, but people thought these people are their “friends” who would listen to their feedback and care about their wants.

        Turns out they aren’t, and that for enough money they will do literally anything without any moral bounds. That stings for people who are really attached to these people.

        Personally I couldn’t give two shits about any of these comedians, but if somebody I liked like Stavros went and performed there I’d be pretty pissed off at him. We all have our stupid hobbies.

        • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          9 days ago

          Many of those people wouldn’t consider it a personal betrayal if they didn’t already have an attachment to moral grandstanding on the issue

          They’d consider it the same way they consider comedians performing on US military bases overseas, which is they would ignore it wholesale and call you woke for bringing it up

          Think of it this way, is it really likely most of these Americans hold their “concern” about the human rights of brown muslims OVER their parasocial media obsessions? No, absolutely not lmao, the idea is ludicrous in the extreme, so that tells us something else and far less noble is more important, and that’s a permission structure to grandstand and gripe about comedians they already have cultural issues with, something I’ve already seen with many comments claiming they knew Bill Burr went bad “when he went woke” which is a take that obviously doesn’t track considering the grandstanding about human rights

          • WildWeezing420 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            They’d consider it the same way they consider comedians performing on US military bases overseas

            If Bill Burr did that I would mock him and clown on him. Bill Burr is popular among lefty Hasan types, hence why he’s getting more shit than the other more right-leaning comedians are. Those are the types that would be mad in either scenario. Doesn’t come across as hypocritical at all to me.

            • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              9 days ago

              Lefty Hasan types and lefties in general are a minuscule fringe minority when it comes to this backlash, dislike of Saudi Arabia is not a left or right issue in the United States (and that’s my point) literally everyone, libs, chuds, and leftists are dogging on the Festival

              Of course leftists are better equipped to construct an actually good take on the subject that doesn’t turn them into boldfaced hypocrites, but not the liberals or chuds who are feigning outrage over this, who absolutely make up the supermajority of the reaction and who can’t articulate or construct a coherent take that doesn’t fly in the face of reality concerning REAL US-Saudi relations

    • WildWeezing420 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      9 days ago

      performing directly for a state event, paid for by the crown, is a bit different than just existing and working inside the US. The comparison would be if a non-American comedian came to the USA and did a Republican Party event paid for by Trump.

      • princeofsin [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        performing directly for a state event, paid for by the crown, is a bit different than just existing and working inside the US.

        Analyzing 900+ films + TV from 1896–2000 90%+ of Arab/Muslim characters were depicted as terrorists, bombers, or violent extremists. Even in non-political films.

        USA is directly tied to these film industries which dehumanize people like me everyday so where is the outrage?

      • EnsignRedshirt [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 days ago

        This is exactly it. If the comedy festival were merely taking place in Saudi Arabia, organized by an independent event production company, then there wouldn’t be the same reaction. The problem that comedy fans are seeing is that the festival is being directly orchestrated and funded by and for the Saudi royal family. Further, the Saudis are paying disproportionately large sums to the comedians because this is first and foremost a blatant PR exercise. They’re not just booking comedians, they’re buying compliance. That is a qualitatively different thing from these comedians merely taking money to do a festival.

        I’m neither defending nor criticizing the comedians on any moral level, just supporting your thesis. The backlash is about the specific individuals involved, and the motivations behind this festival. It’s not weird that a lot of people are fine with American comedians doing comedy within the normal parameters of the comedy industry, but take issue when those comedians take suspiciously large checks to do PR for the Saudi royal family. One could argue that there isn’t much difference between taking Saudi money vs getting paid by the comedy ecosystem more broadly (I would disagree, fwiw), but even so, that simply isn’t the issue here, and we’re all smart enough to understand why people would see the difference.

        Point being, this isn’t about whether Saudi Arabia is more problematic than the US. Everyone responding as if that’s the issue is either intentionally or unintentionally misunderstanding the situation.

      • MidnightPocket [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Eh - pretty sure Bill making some Saudis chuckle is less problematic than the labor I exert keeping businesses afloat in the US.

        Bill is paying taxes in the US though, so he is cancelled.

    • oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 days ago

      People expect better of him, thought he wouldn’t be willing to take Saudi blood money, and more importantly that he wouldn’t sign a contract censoring what he can say about Saudi Arabia (apparently even after he leaves).

      There’s a reason nobody cares about how Louis CK and such went to Saudi Arabia, his reputation is already bad enough.