

Thanks for the taking the time for the write-up; I was broadly familiar but from a Sunni perspective (which I don’t this was too dissimilar). Starred.
The second anything has even the slightest relation to Iran, it’s treated as more of a threat than zionism.
It was this that prompted me to question whether the intensity of the modern schism was fueled by British and then the USAmerican empires. In my experience historical set backs are often have to be actively stoked materially in the present for that fire to continue to burn, and in the age of Western Hegemony the advantage of amplifying that divison is a tool that I suspect is too lucrative for them not to use.
I find religion often reflects material conditions, so the Catholicism of Cuba looks remarkably different in substance to that of the US or France. I am athiest myself though I was deeply religious in my younger years.
I find that in the West, however, our brand of secularism and the athiesm that resides in the West (1) attempts to obscure ongoing imperialist and settler-colonial relations (2) obscures class relations (3) and is often deeply reactionary compared to many religious folks from the Global South.
I find the West’s athiesm is signficantly represented by the Hitchens, Harris’, and Dawkins’ of this world - I thus often find solidarity easier with religious folks than the patronising empty neutrality of Westerners at large. But I must admit the latter is a disease of being a Westerner and its ongoing genocidal relations with race.