InexplicableLunchFiend [he/him]

The nearly indigent “free lunch fiend” was a recognized social type. An 1872 New York Times story about “loafers and free-lunch men” who “toil not, neither do they spin, yet they ‘get along’”, visiting saloons, trying to bum drinks from strangers: "Should this inexplicable lunch-fiend not happen to be called to drink, he devours whatever he can, and, while the bartender is occupied, tries to escape unnoticed.

  • 0 Posts
  • 128 Comments
Joined 25 days ago
cake
Cake day: December 13th, 2025

help-circle







  • America has the citizens of the EU in a snare trap. The harder they balk at Trump and get offended by him going after EU allies, the more they “increase their own military spending”, the more they purchase American weapon systems and fuel the American MIC, which makes them even more dependent on American systems.

    Honestly, masterful stroke by American Imperialists. The war in Ukraine put all of the EU into warmonger mode, and now the only way the citizens there can think of “rebelling” against the US is to get more deeply involved with the US - since the actual alternatives, which are economic divestment and domestic weapons productions are off the table due to de-industrialization from increased energy prices.

    The EU is now incapable of making their own militaries, they are incapable of allying with “evil” nations like Russia, China, Iran, etc. So that leaves them with America. You made your bed buckos, hope you sleep well








  • Something overlooked and not mentioned by either side of the conflict in Venezuela is how much entangled interests there are between both sides. It’s got that awkward situation like the Russia-Ukraine war where both sides still do business (trading uranium, natural gas, gold, etc) and there are pipelines that neither side wants to see damaged.

    We should really be looking into the specifics of the oil industry in Venezuela a bit more if we want to gain insight into how this might proceed. Chevron is already heavily involved with Venezuelan oil production if I recall correctly. They would like to maintain their monopoly, increase investments & not damage their infrastructure. The Americans will want to preserve and secure the ports, rails, pipelines and oil production facilities in their ongoing air strikes or operations or eventual invasion.

    On the other hand, don’t be surprised if a deal is struck where America gets more access to Venezuelan oil but not all of it. Basically just increasing the exploitation Chevron is already doing there even further, at gunpoint.

    Venezuela does have a card to play though in the very bad scenario of full invasion, which is to do what Nasser did when Israel invaded and tried to steal the Suez Canal from Egypt. Scuttle ships, block the canal for everyone. Venezuela could destroy the facilities rather than hand them over to the Americans, or at the very least threaten to/start to. Or fortify them as military outposts, forcing the Americans to risk damaging the facilities when attacking them and limiting the size of bombs they can realistically use. Then retreat into the jungles and rural areas for protracted war against the occupiers.