• zipper [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    quantum computing is still in its very early infancy, literally NOTHING about it is stable yet. we can barely get them to run a dijkstra’s algorithm, let alone anything actually useful. if you don’t keep the processor cool enough it’ll just kill itself, and we’re already trying to mass produce them? putting that aside, quantum computers have a very small use case. most things it does, a classical computer can do better. who is the target userbase for this? the very saturated market of theoretical quantum physicists? i am very skeptical of this man

      • zipper [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        field has promise but for the next few years it’s not gonna have much use, can’t wait for quantum cybersec to become a thing tho

    • gwysibo [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I know little, but wasn’t microsoft hawking some quantum accelerator chip a while back? It was a card like a GPU that you put into a regular PC’s expansion slot to do quantum calculations. Expensive (a few thousand) and still niche but seemed like a good enough proof of concept that you can mass manufacture these things

      • zipper [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        it was built off a theoretical particle (majorana) and as always they conveniently left out some things so from what i remember the chip was fundamentally useless because it barely worked in practice and the existence of the particle it was built on is still very dubious (aka we’ve got no proof it’s actually a thing). read more here

      • zipper [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        that too, but classic cybersecurity is already neglected enough in the field, let alone this new and novel technology that nobody has any idea how to properly use yet.

    • Mactan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      if I heard about them right, the appeal of photonic ones is they’re room temp

      • zipper [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        second point still stands, but damn they’ve made a room temp quantum computer? we might be making advances for once.

    • caesarsushi404 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Broadly speaking, we’ll see exponential advances in simulation/modelling capacity especially related to medicine/industry. Possible advances in space exploration (think: newly discovered materials, energy efficiency). State actors will use quantum computing to crack modern encryption as one of the earliest applications.

      • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think it’s way too early to talk about any of that, a lot of the stuff quantum computing promises is still only theoretical and so far there hasn’t been a single “real” quantum computer that behaves is it does in the theory.

        • caesarsushi404 [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          IBM’s roadmap is pretty aggressive, with users projected to start running “large-scale quantum-centric problems by 2029”

          With respect to theory, Google’s 105-qubit Willow processor performed a benchmark task in 5 minutes that would take the world’s fastest classical supercomputers 10 septillion years to complete.

          I’m not sure this stuff is as theoretical or distant as it might feel.

          • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I’ll believe it when I see it tbh, these companies are known to lie through their teeth about this shit, quantum computing is IMO a bubble not too dissimilar to the AI bubble, just maybe less money overall involved.