• lefaucet@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    All bonkers stuff.

    I think it important we consciously focus more on how we remove power from these folks than speculate on the weird stuff at the meetings and stuff.

    Like Epstein fudgers, yeah we could spend forever trying to find out what specific rapes happened so we can present an iron-clad case… Or focus on how to remove thems grip on the nations steering wheel and let a few hundred lawyers trawl the heineous in the files while we do the much larger and important job of unseating them instead of relying on slow-ass courts who half the time decide to allow our constitution violated while they ponder the intracasies of the arguments to be presented to the lawyers in 2 months time, then allowing 2 more weeks for the plantifs to form a rebuttle and file any motions they can cook up with their $millions legal war-chest, of course

    Then, as the case work against them never stopped, they get sent to jail because their pardon-powers presidential immunity man who’s puppeting the DOJ and FBI and half the courts is no longer president… Like before they die and get away with it… God damn trynna-run-out-the-clock-against-justice bastards

    Ah heck… Lookuh me… rambling again…

    Anyway, anyone have any ideas?

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Soc 101 taught that changing an issue is getting a large consensus of society to admit something is a problem for society, which means a broad swath of society has to see evidence, again and again and again. It’s maddeningly slow, but material conditions affecting the broad swath of society can speed it up.