I’m going to paste comments here I made elsewhere, since this seems to be a fraught topic:
I don’t understand why discussing Jewish racism is ok and not Jewish supremacy, in general. I understand the fear of a Jewish panic and crimes against people simply because they are Jewish, and that is a real possibility that we should also discuss, as well as how best to circumvent it. But ignoring problems haven’t had a great track record for making them go away.
Additionally, we should be willing to address any supremacist ideology, whether race based, religion based, or any other human ideology that exalts one over another.
we should be able to discuss it.
Well there was the whole Protocols of the Elders of Zion uproar, but this book isn’t written by white supremacists. Christian zionists are a special kind of ignorant.
In my opinion, anyone claiming to believe in a supreme deity, Jew, Christian, Hindu is really overcomplicating the subject by claiming supremacy. Either G-d (or whatever other name used) created everything and everyone, or didn’t. No one should be using The Epic of Gilgamesh or anything based on it as an instruction manual. And to further piss off some people, I prefer other aspects known as the 72 names of G-d more often than the Caanite war and storm aspect (and appreciate the “I am becoming what I am becoming” translation of the tetragrammaton more than “I am”). Judaism has a lot of beauty in it. And like all ideologies, can be and is
marriedmarred by human ugliness.agreed 100%
Thank you for not being afraid of this and allowing it. I doubt it will get much traction, but ignoring human-caused climate change isn’t working out great either, nor the Unionists appeasing the slavers. Plausible deniability for everyone causes suffering for everyone.
This book was referenced by former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon as inspiration for Judeo-Nazis.
Why haven’t I heard of this book before now?