Multiple people at Boulder’s Pearl Street Mall in Colorado were burned when they were attacked by a man during a march for Israeli hostages Sunday, according to police.

Witnesses at the scene told CBS Colorado that the suspect attacked people with Molotov cocktails who were participating in a walk to remember the Israeli hostages who remain in Gaza.

Run For Their Lives, which organized the walk, said, “This is not a protest; it is a peaceful walk to show solidarity with the hostages and their families, and a plea for their release.”

“So we stood up, lined up in front of the old Boulder courthouse, and I was actually on the far west side. And there was somebody there that I didn’t even notice, although he was making a lot of noise, but I’m just focused on my job of being quiet and getting lined up. And, from my point of view, all of a sudden, I felt the heat. It was a Molotov cocktail equivalent, a gas bomb in a glass jar, thrown. Av [another marcher] saw it, a big flame as high as a tree, and all I saw was someone on fire,” said Victor.

Video of the scene shows what appears to be a burn scar in front of the old courthouse and a person being taken away on a stretcher. Photos from a viewer show a shirtless man at the scene being detained by police.


FBI Director Kash Patel, in a statement, described the incident as a targeted terror attack and said agents were on the scene.

Redfearn, however, said it was too early to speculate about a motive. “We are not calling it a terror attack at this moment,” he said.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fbi-investigating-targeted-terror-attack-boulder-colorado-director-says-2025-06-01/

  • thethirdgracchi [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 days ago

    The American public’s opinion re: the genocide is entirely irrelevant. There’s a far better chance that consistent stochastic terror acts against Zionists convinces the US elite to stop providing support to Israel than the opinions of the public. There’s no need for the USAmerican state to listen to the will of the public, and indeed they never have unless backed up with the promise of violence.

      • thethirdgracchi [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m not saying the American public doesn’t care about the genocide. I’m saying even if 90% of the American public wanted the genocide to end it wouldn’t matter because those in power won’t stop supporting Israel. The United States isn’t a democracy in the sense that the government listens to the will of the public.

      • Dimmer06 [he/him,comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        It doesn’t lol. The American left just runs with whatever narrative it feels comfortable with. Kamala losing because of her Zionism was just blatantly made up too. Very little if anything the American left thinks is rooted in the actual politics of the US proletariat and it leads to inconsistency and spontaneity.

        • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          the hardest part of being able to tell what happened in a US election and how it might have gone differently with different decisions is that nobody ever talks to people who didn’t vote but are amenable to voting in general.

      • T34_69 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Simple, it’s continuity of agenda. You think it wouldn’t have escalated to complete blockade and starvation if Harris had won?

        Regardless, the genocide continues no matter how the election played out.

        • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          i dare say it would be worse under a biden part 2.

          they didn’t even have the sense to lie to us about it, much less find a more reaganesque 🤮 figurehead who would make israel back down, and i think lying about being zionists or finding some non-zio neolib would’ve won. of course this is all assuming they wanted to win which they didn’t so shrug-outta-hecks

      • Sinisterium@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because they further strain from understanding towards the aesthetics of revolutionary acts. Idealist thinking.

        Is the genocide something that cost kamala votes or do americans not care at all and somehow won’t develop an aversion of people being randomly targeted (in their minds).

      • CrawlMarks [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because the elections are rigged to operate on razor thin margins. In that case a few voters here and there can interfere with their plans. It can’t meaningfully change anything but it can be slightly inconvenient