I don’t expect this to play particularly well here, and maybe I’m just being conspiratorial, but here goes:

I banned jordanlund@lemmy.world from !transgender@lemmy.blahajzone earlier today- he literally posted a matt walsh youtube link and was being otherwise transphobic in a space where that gets you banned. (link)

one of jordanlunds removed comments w/ matt walsh video:

spoiler

the reason I put down was ‘trolling about neopronouns’ I stand by that, it was violating instance rules and was unacceptable behavior from a moderator of another instance.

Shortly after that I got banned from news@lemmy.world for ‘trolling’. To be clear, jordanlund does not moderate news@lemmy.world, but the timing struck me as an odd coincidence.

The .world thread in question (link)

I was expressing my actual opinion/position on this, if anything the post I was replying to should be considered a rule 1 violation implying leftists are russian/under russian sway:

spoiler

The removed comments that I was banned (permanent) for were just me being earnest about my position, which you’re welcome to disagree with.

I don’t view protecting my rights as something worth sacrificing other people for, even if they’re on the other side of the planet. You can be mad at me or hate me for that, but I’m not trolling.

People replying felt it was reasonable to call me an idiot for example, yet another example of selective moderation. on .world.

I don’t have any conclusive proof that my banning Jordanlund and then getting banned are related other than the suspicious timing, I welcome clarification.

Anyway in the interest of neutrality and transparency I submit both my ban and jordanlunds for review.

update

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        0·
        4 months ago

        That’s what my previous comment said.

        We’re trying to make the world a better and more peaceful place instead of just sitting out votes.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          1·
          4 months ago

          I voted in 2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024, every year I was legally able to vote, I even registered early when I was 17 in California. I can gladly give you proof I voted in every election I can because my state has ballot tracking.

          And is it a better and more peaceful place when liberal status quo protects the companies that socially murder its citizens? Punishment of shoplifting is accepted more than trying to arrest Trump and the Jan 6 attackers? Cops can beat up protestors but not protect families from being evicted by greedy landlords?

          “The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

          Liberals haven’t pushed for the rights of my kind. Liberals defend oppressing my kind because it was normal to hate queer people until recently. Liberal politicians didn’t push for legalization unless it was good for polling numbers. But they gladly sat with their ass on their hands while cops arrested and killed queer people for being happy with themselves.

          And I would get into how liberals didn’t push for women’s rights, breaking segregation, ending wars, ending slavery, but I’m not someone who was targeted by them. Liberals don’t stand for what’s right, just what’s currently accepted.

                • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                  1·
                  4 months ago

                  No, but that’s an effective criticism of the Democratic Party choosing to prioritize the status quo of neoliberalism at the continued expense of US citizens (not to mention the victims of US foreign policy), over the prioritization of defeating Fascism by providing genuine solutions for societal problems at the expense of capital owners (such as public housing and universal healthcare) and following US and International Law to stop supplying arms and international support for a genocide.

                  Liberalism will always side with Fascism over any socialist opposition out of profit incentive, as has been the case historically.

                • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
                  1·
                  4 months ago

                  “We should stop putting orphans into the orphan crushing machine.”

                  “What? Didn’t you know the other guy wants to put more orphans into the machine? I say we should be thankful for the old lower amount of orphans crushed.”