admitted that the most likely to be in the race is Gavin Newsom
I didnt say that. I didn’t endorse Newsom or Prtiztker or Carlson or Owens or any one. You want me to be arguing in favor of a candidate a and I think its very clear you are desperately trying to find a way to have a disagreement some specific argument I’m not making. I hold no quarter for any of those candidates. You seem physically incapable of distinguishing between liking or wanting a candidate to win, and recognizing if tactic or strategy is working.
In other words, you are the common clay of the modern political voice.
Two things. Spend the next 12 years reading to develop the reading comprehension necessary to have conversations in a text based format, because right now, you wasting peoples time. I’m offering a nuanced read of the moment and its like I’m having a conversation with a pidgeon only interested in pushing the chess pieces of the board. No ability to understand a point, desperately trying to make something into a weird a parasocial team identity fight, total inability to distinguish between how things are and how we wish they would be.
Second, more than willing to argue with you. But you actually have to argue against the points I’m making, or at least have the ability to understand them, which you haven’t shown the ability to do. If you don’t have the reading comprehension to do so, just don’t.
I didnt say that. I didn’t endorse Newsom or Prtiztker or Carlson or Owens or any one. You want me to be arguing in favor of a candidate a and I think its very clear you are desperately trying to find a way to have a disagreement some specific argument I’m not making. I hold no quarter for any of those candidates. You seem physically incapable of distinguishing between liking or wanting a candidate to win, and recognizing if tactic or strategy is working.
In other words, you are the common clay of the modern political voice.
Two things. Spend the next 12 years reading to develop the reading comprehension necessary to have conversations in a text based format, because right now, you wasting peoples time. I’m offering a nuanced read of the moment and its like I’m having a conversation with a pidgeon only interested in pushing the chess pieces of the board. No ability to understand a point, desperately trying to make something into a weird a parasocial team identity fight, total inability to distinguish between how things are and how we wish they would be.
Second, more than willing to argue with you. But you actually have to argue against the points I’m making, or at least have the ability to understand them, which you haven’t shown the ability to do. If you don’t have the reading comprehension to do so, just don’t.
If it helps, you’re absolutely right on and this thread was maddening to read lol.