China has introduced a new measure to combat misinformation, requiring influencers sharing information on sensitive topics to hold a degree in that area.

The rule, which came into effect on 25 October under the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), is reportedly aimed at reducing online misinformation and protecting social media users from potentially harmful advice or guidance.

Influencers discussing subjects such as medicine, law, education, or finance must provide proof of their expertise, whether through a professional licence or degree. Platforms including Douyin (China’s version of TikTok), Bilibili, and Weibo are tasked with verifying these credentials.

The CAC has also banned advertising for medical products and services, such as health foods and supplements, in an effort to curb promotions disguised as educational content.

So you’re saying I can’t continue promoting dick pills that might cause people’s organs to boil? alex-no-supplements

  • femur@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    This would simply be impossible to replicate in the west, for the straight forward reason that trust in the government is so incredibly low.

  • daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    “Sounds good on paper, but getting a degree isn’t the only way to have knowledge on a topic.”

    “I don’t know how so many see this as a good thing, like this is blatant silencing of the common man, basically saying ‘you’re just a regular person working a regular job, you have no say in what goes on in society.’”

    I agree with these guys. Guess we’ll see how it’s implemented.

  • sodium_nitride [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    2 days ago

    Absolutely based.

    “I’m all for free speech, but the self-proclaimed health gurus are causing so much damage and honestly need some regulation so I’m for this regulation,” one user wrote. “You can’t practice medicine, psychology, physio etc, without a license, so I’m not sure why they were allowed to ‘practice online’ in the first place.”

    This user gets it.

  • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is the way medical subreddits are run and I like it a lot. You prove your credentials to the mods, they’re tagged next to your name, and if a thread becomes something politically/professionally relevant it’s restricted to people with tags. The result is that those threads typically have good comment sections without most of the typical reddit bullshit. They aren’t stuck re-justifying germ theory to a 10th century peasant with a smartphone or sorting through spam/troll comments.

  • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I. NO INVESTIGATION, NO RIGHT TO SPEAK

    Unless you have investigated a problem, you will be deprived of the right to speak on it. Isn’t that too harsh? Not in the least. When you have not probed into a problem, into the present facts and its past history, and know nothing of its essentials, whatever you say about it will undoubtedly be nonsense. Talking nonsense solves no problems, as everyone knows, so why is it unjust to deprive you of the right to speak? Quite a few comrades always keep their eyes shut and talk nonsense, and for a Communist that is disgraceful. How can a Communist keep his eyes shut and talk nonsense?

    It won’t do!

    It won’t do!

    You must investigate!

    You must not talk nonsense!

  • Sam [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    Considering that we now know the US funded anti-vax stuff during Covid in the Phillipines (thats the one they admitted to at least), this is probably a smart move.

  • sisatici [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    one of the biggest advantages of china over uSSa is that they don’t have such rampant anti intellectualism. imagine being elitist while being anti intellectual.

    • growing up in the dumbass soup of shithole america, i did not recognize how pervasive anti-intellectualism is here. i read some article maybe 10-15 years ago about the phenomenon from an outsiders perspective and it was eye opening.

      authority to speak on a topic here is recognized as having access to a platform and an audience. rigorous study, demonstrated expertise, peer recognition are all easily handwaved away as belonging to a corrupted process, but having a single benefactor that can put your face or voice all over the landscape is treated as a mandate if enough people stop to look/listen.

      and its been this way here apparently since the earliest days of carnival barking snake oil salesmen, confidence artists and ink-by-the-barrel printers pitching the latest magic cure-all.

      people want to blame tiktok and facebook and podcasts, but these are just the latest tools. talk shows, talk radio, periodicals, pamphlets & papers played a similar role.

      and, sadly, there are people out there looking for factual answers that totally exist, but have been indoctrinated by the powerful not to trust anything but how some voice of the spectacle makes them feel… while maintaining pure cynicism against anything that reeks of education.

      it’s like that post about how somebody’s grandfather was immune to communist propaganda because they were illiterate.

  • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m really torn here between “this is unbelievably based and would do incalculable good if applied worldwide, and in fact if this were done in the U.S. 20 years ago we’d be living in an entirely different future” and being big butt mad because I have a lot of opinions and hate being shut up. Also even though i’m just a biology degree dropout that doesn’t mean I know nothin, yknow

  • Midnight_Pearl [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    “I don’t know how so many see this as a good thing, like this is blatant silencing of the common man, basically saying ‘you’re just a regular person working a regular job, you have no say in what goes on in society.’”

    well let’s see: if you’re a regular person working a regular job in china, you have access to their insanely cheap higher education. alternatively, if a regular person working a regular job in china wants to get involved with what goes on in society directly (making medical disinformation slop doesn’t do that), they can join the CPC because china is an actually-functioning democracy where anyone can contribute if they’re willing to put in the effort.

      • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        And a lot of Western neolib “democracies” don’t directly vote for our heads of state either… I mean, Amerikkka’s system sucks, but so does British style parliamentarianism, and quite frankly a lot of ways we do representative democracy suck. At least Soviet style demcen admits to its issues and is upfront about how it works, when practiced correctly.

        • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          The Last few years definitely showed me how “democracy” as we practice it isn’t that great, absolute “free speech” is not an ideal worth striving for, and the average burgerlander is so easily propagandized. Covid showed how these racist bigoted fucks I have to live with have no sense of community and don’t care about making themselves or their families sick… great job “owning the libs” by killing your grandparents early and giving yourselves long COVID 😬

          I know there’s good people here too, but are they the majority? IDK

          • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            Yep. “Free speech” isn’t worth much if it means any idiot can open his mouth and spout bigotry and no one’s allowed to do anything about it besides try to talk over him with ideals of community and caring, and individualism held up as a core ideal of a society does nothing but destroy community.