hello_hello [undecided, comrade/them]

pfp: ah_to_hk separatist Hong Kong political cartoon that ironically made Olympic gold medalist Vivian Kong look very based. (src)

Read Free Software, Free Society pls

  • 0 Posts
  • 242 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 11th, 2024

help-circle
  • a move [Taiwan] that could draw Western sanctions on Beijing or even a US naval blockade that disrupts China’s sea-borne oil imports.

    Because the last blockade worked so well on a country that didnt even have a peer navy that didnt get sucker sunked at the very start of the war.

    DW is a German state publication, so their aim is to widen the wedge between russo-sino relations and hope that Power of Siberia 2 is delayed as much as possible. Predictably, euro-american imperialists want Russia to stay in the West and simply accept its second class position perpetually. Driving sinophobia is the key aim of the new cold war to delegitmize any cooperation outside of western control.

    Hopefully POS II is realized and Russia will have pivoted its energy exports away from the transient warzone that NATO had created.







  • JPMorgan writing this as if they don’t have an interest in carving up a post war Ukraine through privatization and cannibalizing the soviet era industry.

    This does track with the liberal analysis though which posits that the war started solely due to Ukraine’s desire to join the EU and NATO and not an intervention in an already existing civil war.

    This analysis has a lot of hopium attached to it considering how much of Ukraine was sold off to the highest bidder and the demographic collapse. We’d then have to understand that this report serves a dual purpose of actually prolonging the war by providing such a naive analysis to investors and news pundits (also LMAO at that russian death toll just pure Ukrainian hasbara)

    Only those on the Russian side can really come to terms with how dire the situation actually is.







  • Machine translation (Firefox 140 ESR) of the end of the linked article regarding immigrants (https://lb.ua/society/2026/04/29/735427_denis_ulyutin_kilkist_lyudey.html)

    In his opinion, after the end of the war or during a stable truce, 2 million Ukrainians will be ready to return to Ukraine. But it will depend on the willingness of hromadas to accept them, adds Minister.

    For those who are abroad, IDPs, even immigrants, if we decide to involve them - a set of criteria and requirements are essentially the same, said Denis Ulyutin: security, access to housing, work, care services, infrastructure. Because people will compare the conditions in which they are now with what they will receive when moving. And therefore, I am sure Ulyutin, in the context of stimulating the return Ukrainians, we need to talk, in particular with international partners, not about the individual support of those who decide to go to Ukraine, but about the support of communities.

    And the opening of the Centers for Unity Abroad, the minister believes, plays an important role here, as they will provide Ukrainians both forensic services and the most complete information about the possibility of returning to their homeland. The first Center for Unity was opened in Germany, where the most Ukrainians are now (up to 1.3 million), the following are also planned - in the Czech Republic, Poland, Sweden.

    The idea of potential payments to emigrants for returning to Ukraine, which are periodically discussed in the public space, the Minister of Social Policy rejected categorically. This, in his opinion, will negatively hit and So the fragile situation in the country, polarizes society and generates a potential conflict between 6 million of those who left, and 4.2 million IDPs who were forced to abandon their homes. However, they remained in the country.

    The approach for Ukraine to consolidate its diaspora are a pipe dream at best. How much could you really pay someone to go back to a country where the leaders reject diplomacy and encourage Nazism when you’re living in the US/EU?





  • The riddle of why Washington was so caught off guard is perhaps best answered by Netanyahu’s assurances to Trump that the Islamic Republic would collapse in mere days. Astonishingly, there was no contingency plan beyond that.

    Capitalist war machine can’t plan more than 1 day in advance apparently. Puts into perspective why China has not reunified with Taiwan, accounting for all the possible variables takes years/decades worth of planning and even then it’s still too risky to initiate.

    Don’t siege Tehran, bury a girls school and murder a 86 year old man with his family instead i-am-adolf-hitler.

    After reports emerged in early March of the CIA working with Kurdish militants “with the aim of fomenting a popular uprising in Iran,” even Zionist think tank pundits and diaspora activists warned such action was a recipe for disaster, which would unite Iranians of every extraction in opposition.

    lenin-dont-laugh

    hamas-red-triangle the-boys-are-back-in-town
    settler “So anyway I bought a property in southern lebanon”


  • Less smarmy response because I have a bad habit of doing them:

    To label Iran as a theocracy in this way feels very tone deaf to me. In addition to what Awoo said, the clerical elite/revolutionary leaders of Iran have sacrificed so much of themselves to defend the Iranian nation and its people. Not to mention how there is a whole electoral power system alongside the clerical class. This callous off-hand reference to reducing the material conditions of Iran to “just a theocracy” is the sort of ideological alienation Marxists should seek to avoid.

    The US has repeatedly invoked religious rhetoric in the Ramadan War, explaining to its own military that this war is about securing Christianity (or something else I can’t remember). The Iranian side has not done the same, every diplomatic movement from Iran is made using calculated, materialist decision making that is aligned with “International Law” to a frustrating degree and repeatedly punished for it.

    Also Persepolis (2003) and its consequences were a disaster for the western perception of Iran not rooted in veiled women and repressive “totalitarianism”