PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]

The Zionists do not have a monopoly on the term “blood libel.” Joe Biden claiming he saw pictures of “40 beheaded babies” on live television is the greatest example of blood libel in the 21st century.

Not to mention the IOF firing at a diplomatic mission in the West Bank earlier today.

Not to write this off or anything because it does outline how things will get worse, but this has been the plan since October 7th. Framing this as an evil Heritage Foundation / Project 2025 plot is a cowardly ass-covering strategy for the liberal institutions (news media, academia, state agencies, the Democratic party, and many nominally progressive NGOs) which took the initiative all on their own to crush any opposition to this genocide. The New York Times gets to publish exposes like this and pretend they have absolutely no blood on their hands. That they didn’t spend the past two years sowing the seeds which are now blooming.

Case in point, just the other day the New York Times asked Ms. Rachel in an interview if she was being paid by Hamas because she commented that killing children is wrong. Was that part of Project Esther too? I don’t think so. The commitment to genocide is systemic and institutionalized. It is not the product of any particular conservative NGO. It is the consensus in Washington, across the board. “You’re either with us, or against us,” as George Bush put it.

Hope this holds.

The republicans are smart politicians. They give their supporters everything they want, instead of giving their enemies everything they want.