• AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    He was a chud who targeted the CDC because he blamed vaccines for his long covid symptoms, you’re “critically” supporting a fascist to own the libs. And honestly, that’s what has been wrong with the site for months, you’re all so obsessed with the Bidenists living rent free in your head that half of you are about to turn full Strasserite. This is disgusting, do some self crit asap you reactionary loser.

    • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      sorrynotsorry for being mad about the social murder of over a millios of our fellow proles in the last five years, and during the HIV epidemic before that

      I’ll self-crit the second you anarcho-bidenists do some self crit over you’re knee jerk defense of the institutions of this cursed settler state.

      • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The person doing the shooting was a fascist who thought vaccines as a category are bad. You are mad at someone for not cheering for armed antivaxx insurrection. You are not owning the democrats here.

        I’m not gonna cry over dead cops, but the antivaxx shooter isn’t a hero fighting for the proletariat.

        • LargeAdultRedBook [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          but the antivaxx shooter isn’t a hero fighting for the proletariat.

          Why do we have to endorse or denounce his actions or motives? In his stupidity, he clapped a cop. Don’t care what he believed, but this is a better outcome than most chud adventurists doing anything will have.

            • LargeAdultRedBook [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Is it though?

              My reading was that people are scolding the top level comment for “critical support” of someone targeting an institution that chuds hate.

              To me, it’s clear this is a joke and the purpose of the original comment is to express joy that a cop got eliminated.

              I don’t think ButtBidet or anyone else here would be similarly celebratory in a repeat scenario where a bunch of CDC PMC libs got eliminated instead.

              • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                It is, yes, thanks for asking.

                If your response to this this is “oh they don’t actually hold any negative views towards the cdc they’re just joking” then frankly you’re just being dishonest.

                • LargeAdultRedBook [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  The CDC can genuinely be an institution that does more harm than good and also not be a good target for adventurism.

                  If you think @combat_brandonism wants terrorism to happen to the CDC because of this comment, say so.

                  I interpret the “let them fight” emote as “Who cares? They are both dogshit. Why defend the CDC’s honor?” Not a celebration of the target choice. Nor wishing for violence for CDC employees.

                  Again idgaf either way. Only put in my two cents because I felt that the accusation of being called a Strasserite and reactionary is extremely uncharitable when the commenter is clearly just fucking around, but also pissed that the CDC sacrificed some of our grandparents.

                  • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Anyway we literally have people in this thread saying adventurism targeting the CDC is good actually, so I gotta say: Who do you think you’re fooling? Do you think there’s some hypothetical third party observer here who can’t read the thread themselves?

          • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The idea that a single fascist with a gun is anything but a fascist with a gun and shouldn’t be treated as a fascist with a gun is equally fucking lib shit.

              • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                It is kind of funny that you did immediately default to defending the honor of the facebook anti vaxx vanguard like this. Are you gonna defend qanon next? maga?

                  • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Oh no i am mad. It’s not haha funny that you leap to the defense of fascist brainworms. It is funny in the colloquial sense that it is a curiosity that I am seeing defenses here that no one is supporting adventurism while you’re not only doing that, but pretending that someone who had their brain replaced with a facebook feed (i.e. a fascist) going to do a mass shooting is engaging in meaningful direct action.