• kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I want to see video. The Israeli government has been caught lying --wildly and self servingly lying while not valuing human life too many times for anything they report to be taken as factual.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Not a great look on your part.

      Someone was indoctrinated enough to take up knifes and try to kill police man/Israeli people in an embassy. That’s a tragedy at any rate.

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Actually perfectly intelligible. A dead assailant doesn’t exist. If you are dead you are no longer a possible assailant.

          • Deadrek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            In English it should read something like, “shoot dead an assailant(still not really ideal) or shot an assailant dead(to death preferably).”

            The mechanics of the title aren’t quite right. While most people will infer the correct meaning, some unnecessary jokes will be made by someone as you can see.

            The way the title reads now it would be interpreted as cops shot the, already dead, corpse of an assailant that died by some other means possibly unrelated to the police.

          • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            People are still referred to as criminals or terrorists after they have been killed, why is assailant different?