• Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Actually perfectly intelligible. A dead assailant doesn’t exist. If you are dead you are no longer a possible assailant.

      • Deadrek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In English it should read something like, “shoot dead an assailant(still not really ideal) or shot an assailant dead(to death preferably).”

        The mechanics of the title aren’t quite right. While most people will infer the correct meaning, some unnecessary jokes will be made by someone as you can see.

        The way the title reads now it would be interpreted as cops shot the, already dead, corpse of an assailant that died by some other means possibly unrelated to the police.

      • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        People are still referred to as criminals or terrorists after they have been killed, why is assailant different?