I was banned for supporting the right of people in eastern Ukraine for not wishing to be part of the state banning their language and doing g pogroms not just against Russians bot Jews and Roma people for 12 years prior to the Russian intervention.

Tanuki was banned just for posting a video of civilians being kidnapped off the street to be forced into a war they know is a lost cause.

If this is what you call Anarchism I am ashamed of you.

  • moth@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    moth, apparently

    freedom is being independent of a government. a strawman is what you just tried.

    including the ones who style themselves as “anarchists"

    are you badjacketing moth? is moth incorrect in believing that is against the rules of both dbzer0 and hexbear? moth would like an apology.

    • LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      freedom is being independent of a government.

      What a ridiculous definition of freedom. It is very much something an ancap would say. You make statements like that and then say I’m badjacketing you? lol, you are openly donning that jacket of your own accord, and zipping it up nice and snug for all to see. Just because I made note of what you’re apparently choosing to wear doesn’t mean I’m the one who put it on you. (I will say though, that in my experience, it is always a specific kind of doofus who constantly refers to themselves in third person, though that’s beside the point).

      • moth@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is very much something an ancap would say.

        moth does not believe you are as smart as you think you are.

        it is always a specific kind of doofus who constantly refers to themselves in third person

        why are you are refusing to use moth’s preferred pronouns? not only that, insulting moth for them as well? you are out of line.

        • Leon_Grotsky [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          why are you are refusing to use moth’s preferred pronouns?

          c’mon dude you don’t have to stand on the table baring your entire ass like this, that’s setting aside people can only see your pronouns if they are viewing them from your instance.

          • moth@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            moth supposes that “any” does not mean “insult”. moth is alarmed that you think it might, and questions whether you might have internalized biases against queer people. moth believes you can do better.

        • LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Someone who equates freedom with a lack of government is not in any position to judge the intelligence of others.

          As for pronouns, now I know you’re just bad faith trolling. I am a nonbinary person, and I do respect people’s pronouns, even when they are people who are unwitting apologists for fascists. The trans/nonbinary community consensus draws a clear line between pronouns and self-referential speech patterns, and it is bad faith trolls (trying to use our respect for pronouns against us) who conflate the two. Pronouns are a linguistic stand-in for a person’s name when you’re not directly addressing them. Pronouns are not a title, they’re not a mark of respect on that person (even though pronouns should be respected). Referring to yourself in the third person is a speech pattern, not a pronoun. As many other trans and nonbinary people have said, self-referring in third person is a stylistic choice about how someone talks about themselves, not a request about how others should refer to them. So who is badjacketing who here?

          Also it is typical trolling behavior to completely derail a thread with a tangential (bad faith) accusation, especially when they know they have no counter arguments in the actual discussion.

          • moth@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Someone who equates freedom with a lack of government is not in any position to judge the intelligence of others.

            … exactly what do you think it is that anarchists believe?

            As for pronouns, now I know you’re just bad faith trolling.

            moth would argue with you, but moth doubts you will be around long enough to make it worthwhile, having said something so anathema to the ideals of this instance.

      • moth@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        more practical at this current time, perhaps. but seeing as how both sides are conscripting everyone they can to fight this meaningless war started by old white men, moth struggles to see the meaning in it.