What law? Official source?
Menin initially aimed to establish protest-free buffer zones of up to 100 feet outside synagogues but revised the bill after pushback from Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch, some progressive Jewish groups and free speech advocates, under threat of legal challenges.
A watered-down version of that legislation that allows the NYPD to determine how large buffer zones need to be on a case-by-case basis passed with a veto-proof majority last month. Mamdani allowed the bill to become law without his signature.
IndStand back again looking for any way possible to frame progressive Dems as bad
Mamdani allowed the bill to become law without his signature.
You are highlighting the wrong part of the sentence
So you’re upset he didn’t engage in some theatrics to veto the veto proof bill rather than to be upset with the counsel that put it out there?
Yes he did not put up a fight against very clear violations of the first amendement.
It wasn’t his law, and there was nothing he could do about it. He didn’t add his signature, which is a reasonable protest.
Grasping at straws to find fault here mate.
“We are powerless to do anything about this”. Now that sounds very familiar.
He promised New York would be a city adhering to international law. By allowing sales of stolen Palestinian land in Synagogues, New York is directly in violation of international law.
Zohran has many levers to pull. But he refuses to pull them.
This is a tough one.
Protesting the actions of a synagoge should be legal and protests are most effective outside the organisation itself. At the same time harassment based on identity needs to be prevented.
IMO that law should not exist. Anti-discrimination laws are enough of a tool that you don’t need this sort of legislation.
