• footfaults@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not to mention, the interceptors themselves are huge multiples of cost compared to the drones. Cheap drones and missiles versus incredibly complicated and expensive interceptors.

    • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      This has been the play for a while now. The West became so smug about their air superiority that they went all-in on million-dollar-a-shot missile defense systems. How could their missiles penetrate our INVINCIBLE IRON DOME?

      Well, it turns out some dudes making a few thousand gigantic glorified bottle rockets in a garage can make that get really expensive really fast. And it also turns out that you can’t intercept all of them when that happens.

      • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        God we really are Nazi Germany, who thought sloped armor was just the Soviets compensating for having “Judeo-Bolshevik steel instead of strong, Aryan steel.”

        Lo and behold, Soviet tanks turning German tanks into magicians who disappear into thin air while German shells bounced off at point-blank ranges. Cost of a T-34? Some ~$13,000ish in materials and labor in 1941. Cost of a Tiger in 1941? Over $200,000 because they were basically using artisinal screws.