• BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s funny that they clearly aren’t considering that religions other than theirs also exist. That’s the whole point of the Separation of Church and State. Your arbitrary religious views have no place in government or governance or public spaces… because others have other beliefs, many of which likely stand in stark contrast to yours, and the permutations are endless. Leaving your religious biases out of public life allows us all to coexist.

    But lets ignore that and see what happens. Looking forward to The Satanic Temple having a presence in all public schools. Maybe muslims can get the Five Pillars and Buddhists can get the Noble Truths… and we’re just getting started.

    • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They’re not ignoring it, they’re fully aware, and it’s the whole point. They want an official state religion to suppress all others. They’ve been perfectly willing and able to blatantly ignore facts, evidence, and existing law and jurisprudence to benefit one religion over all others.

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    He continued: “You can’t treat religious people and religious institutions and religious speech as second-class in the United States… And when you have a program that’s open to all comers except religion… that seems like rank discrimination against religion.”

    No, you stupid cunt. Religious institutions are special snowflakes that enjoy tax-exempt status and steal billions of dollars from this country by existing. Now you want to give them billions more on top of it. Fuck you Brett Kavanaugh you treasonous piece of shit.

    • Infinite@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, the idea isn’t that church and state are matter/antimatter, but that the state shouldn’t be used to direct people towards or away from any religion.

      If the government establishes fair criteria for “school eligible for federal funding” then there’s no reason those schools must be secular or of any particular religion.

      Wait until some MAGAt groks that their tax dollars might go to a (((school))) or end up helping Muslims in some way.

      TBF, this regime doesn’t actually support any form of real education.

  • pinheadednightmare@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Religion is a belief. School curriculum is made based on facts and experiments over time. They should not be combined.

  • opus86@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Letting Religion run things is how you get the dark ages again. They were called dark for a reason.

    • I_Cant_Even@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Actually no. Refusing to vote for a genocidal candidate, regardless of which side of the aisle or gender they are, is always a good choice. We are not free until we are all free. I demand my politicians not just be the lesser of two evils. I hope you can too. Cuz the drive to vote for a democratic candidate cuz they are not as evil is what got us here in the first place.

      • HP_Rubshaft@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Honestly at this point I consider those who peddle this narrative either bots or literally worse than those who are captured by the cult of MAGA — because they have “reasoned” that giving MAGA free reign makes them morally superior to those who voted for the Democrats. But I have to ask:

        Do you basically just… Not believe in harm reduction?

        Because the argument seems to hinge on the idea that you’d refuse to engage in behaviors that reduce TOTAL harm because there would still BE harm.

        I agree that none of us are truly free until we all are, but I fail to see how outright christofascism AND genocide are the preferable outcome for you here. How exactly does sending people to El Salvadorian work camps and secreting away protesters improve our foothold on this issue, exactly?

        If your idea is that, if gets bad enough, people will have enough anger to fuel your dreams of an uprising of some kind… At the end of the day you’re STILL using human suffering as a bargaining chip while patting yourself on the back for being exactly the kind of non-resistance that MAGA relies on to gain power and momentum.

        Tl;Dr: I really fucking hope you’re an account made for astroturfing and not a real person because “dogshit take” is too soft a descriptor for this line of thinking.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        how’s that working out for you?

        sometimes being an adult means doing distasteful things… both candidates supported genocide… 1 of the candidates also wasn’t racist, economically literate, determined to exterminate the poor, and destroy what little democracy you had

        get the fuck over it… you have 2 bad choices and your lack of choice contributed to this

        • AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          He had one bad choice and one meh choice. There was plenty of progressive legislation in Harris’ platform. These people didn’t get 100% of what they wanted and sat home like entitled children.