• Denys Nykula@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Most positive things about my teenager years, especially when it comes to forming critical thinking by trial and error, was by actively using the Internet using a pseudonym and accounts with providers who didn’t require me to prove my identity. Learning English and programming skills, for example, and talking to people outside the local political bubble. Banning young people from the Internet will also make them more vulnerable, withholding access to the main public forum of nowadays. There was a popular saying in parts of the Runet, “ban kids from the Internet - they make it stupid”; these parts have since become openly fascist. We should fight fascists not kids.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, this is definitely a complicated issue with capitalists and pedophiles to worry about, but at the end of the day I think kids are ultimately safer and more able to intellectually develop when they have some degree of free speech and free association rights, and that’s exactly what use of the Internet and social media in particular is

  • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I have absolutely no answers to this issue but I do see the futility to this.

    1. Parents are wholly incapable to control their kid’s use of these apps as they will find alternate devices, borrow from a friend, outsmart any control apps, etc.

    2. The apps in question have been proven to be designed to psychologically entrap their users. They have also been proven to push psychologically-damaging content, regardless of viewer’s age.

    So I can see a world in which it would be helpful to find a way to restrict what a child can see when online instead of the current situation in which a 10 year old can easily watch videos of beheadings and extreme porn, plan up a meeting with a pedophile or murderer and join 4chan’s /b where they can talk about anything under the sun.

    The issue, as I see it, is that the suggestions made by the politicians will do nothing to curb teen use online as they will most assuredly find ways to bypass any checks. What will happen(and is probably intended) instead is that the gov’t will have more info to use against every citizen, corporations will have more data to compile on their ̶p̶r̶o̶d̶u̶c̶t̶ customers and people that should be able to view said content will be falsely blocked while people that shouldn’t will be able to.

    I’m glad my daughter was growing up in a time before the streamlining and enhancement of the corpo trend of emotional and psychological damage for profit.

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I see it like smoking.

      If people have the idea that something is bad, they will try to cut down.

      It’s not going to be perfect, but nothing ever is

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Lenin dismissed the Economist as “a journal which speaks for British millionaires”. Evergreen take, though maybe the British part is less salient as time goes by.

    • john_t@piefed.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Lenin also founded one of the largest murderous authocratic regimes of the 20th century.

  • dieICEdie@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I say we only let kids talk to kids on social media. Adult accounts can only access adult accounts.

    Obviously they could lie, and there’s no way to prove that. But, hypothetically…