Context: PugJesus often spams low quality posts across the dozen or so communities they mod, apparently downvoting low effort spam on my frontpage is trolling. The only other action in the modlog is a different ban for 74 years for “Mass downvoting innocuous content,” so it definitely seems they are just banning people that dislike their spam. Glad we’re not missing out on the reddit mod experience here.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    16 days ago

    If you don’t post or comment in a community, why are you subscribed to it?

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 days ago

      I’m not, I was viewing all. Sorry, “my frontpage” is probably misleading, I meant the all page on my device.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        16 days ago

        Oh. Well, if you don’t want to see all, don’t go looking at all and then get upset when you see all.

        • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          That’s pretty ridiculous, obviously one can want to see an uncurated list while still judging the value of individual items, that’s not mutually exclusive.

          • OpenStars@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            16 days ago

            Sure, you can totally do that… and also a mod can totally ban someone who mass-downvotes all the posts in a community (rather than simply block it or the submitters). Actually the ball is entirely in your court there to decide what you want to do.

            You may accept that you are going to be banned from communities that it seems you have no interest in seeing anyway, or you can start blocking them so that they do not show up in your All feed.

            “Block early, block often” is practically the motto of Lemmy.

          • OpenStars@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            16 days ago

            You missed the point. The word “My” implies the Subscribed feed, rather than “All”. At least that is the most straightforward interpretation, which explains why the person you responded to thought that.

            • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              ·
              edit-2
              16 days ago

              that doesn’t imply that at all. other people might not filter their front page by subscribed communities. that’s just your assumption based upon what you personally do.

              • OpenStars@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                23
                ·
                16 days ago

                No, back when I used Lemmy I mostly used All. But then I did not call that “my” frontpage, unless I switched to Subscribed. Perhaps there is a language issue here, but the personal form of “my” implies a customization aspect, not the same shared set of posts that everyone sees across all of Lemmy (unless they block content, which OP seems not to).

                Or at least it could imply that, which explains why the person you responded to might have thought that. There is a logical basis for doing so, I am saying.