![[cw sexual assault] Limited Jeffrey Epstein file dump published by USDOJ; UPDATE: Fox News says that government officials were censored in the files as if they were victims, except Bill Clinton](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/510bedad-009f-444c-a4e6-fd6f56eef1ff.png){kind=link}
Basically the Trump administration is violating the law by not releasing all of the files but some were made available.
https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/epstein-files-released-2025/
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-disclosures
https://archive.is/LqkH9 (fox news)
Leaked congress memo written by Todd Blanche.
Ro Khanna says that he wants to impeach or prosecute people for not following his Epstein Files bill.
I think your analysis is inaccurate because we are not talking about the “average Fox News viewer”. There are different branches of Fox News. There are even local Fox News channels which are not similar to the reporting of Fox News National. We’re talking about an ARTICLE on the Fox News WEBSITE.
The article published on Fox News Digital which says that politician names have been redacted was not reported on the Fox News television channel. The extent of the reporting on the Fox News television segments was spotty and ranged from sparse photos of Bill Clinton to briefly mentioning that the files were overly redacted. The Fox News television channel tried to report the release as little as possible. The Fox News channel aired interviews with Todd Blanche himself saying that the release was lawful. Fox News television even had a segment where they claimed that the release had ‘too much information’.
Do you think that the average Fox News viewer also reads the Fox News website? Does the average Fox News viewer even knows how to read?
I know what the mind of an American hog is like. Why do you think that you’re the hog whisperer?