she’s NOT even antisemtitic in any way, shape and form - what’s next, her advocating for public broadcasting in congress after getting defunded (like mr. rogers in the 1960s) is called out as liberalness?
I guess the main difference then would be that, back in the 60s, at least some members of Congress actually had a heart, hence why they agreed to continue funding PBS after Mr. Rogers said his words.
well congress calling ms. rachel crazy would probably lead to protests and that would escalate into a peaceful revolution that would pressure trump and vance to both resign, just like the people power revolution in the phillippines.
she’s NOT even antisemtitic in any way, shape and form - what’s next, her advocating for public broadcasting in congress after getting defunded (like mr. rogers in the 1960s) is called out as liberalness?
I guess the main difference then would be that, back in the 60s, at least some members of Congress actually had a heart, hence why they agreed to continue funding PBS after Mr. Rogers said his words.
well congress calling ms. rachel crazy would probably lead to protests and that would escalate into a peaceful revolution that would pressure trump and vance to both resign, just like the people power revolution in the phillippines.
what