• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Ahh yes. This tired, losing canard.

      America will vote for immigrants. It will vote for women. It will vote for black people. It will vote to defend trans people.

      It doesn’t want to vote for apologists to corporatism.

      Its very clear.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          What alternative did you provide them?

          You do understand that your approach to rhetoric is fundamental to why Democrats lost and Trump won?

            • stoy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              30
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              That is the technical reason.

              There are plenty of reasons for people to decide to not vote in the election.

              • Ever since 2016, the Democrats seem to have run mostly on a plattform of keeping the status quo, Obama ran on “Change”, and managed to change healthcare for the masses with Obamacare. What was the main point in the Democrat campaign in the last election, to an outsider, the answer seems to be “we are not Trump”, which while true, is not interesting or engaging.
              • Kamalas stance on Israel/Gaza, this is a stupid reason not to vote, but an important point, it also ties in with the previous point of that the Democrats didn’t seem to have any idea of what direction they would go if they were elected, other than “steady as she goes”.

              Had the Democrats found and picked a course with a clear message to of what they were going to do when they won, and dropped the “steady as she goes” attitude, they may have won.

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  29
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  Or, and this might be completely revolutionary towards your thinking…

                  Maybe how you approach politics is harmful and supports rightwing movements.

                  • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    Maybe how you approach politics is harmful and supports rightwing movements.

                    I feel like “vote for the prevention of the accession of fascists” should resonate with more people than “let the fascists win to teach the DNC a lesson” did.

    • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Race and gender had absolutely nothing to do with it. Democrat voters as a whole was trying to tell the party they are tired of old white rich men making decisions for them, she did absolutely nothing to differentiate herself from those old rich white men. Voters by and large said we have a red line and that red line is genocide but she continued anyway. His administration went on day after day after day telling us that the economy is good, we are not struggling when we could see in our day-to-day lives that yes we are struggling. The only message that sends is that they are not listening to us.

      The DNC fucked around and found out

        • HopeOfTheGunblade@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Because there’s a vast and well supported propaganda ecosystem on the right keeping their enthusiasm for kicking the shit outta the queers up.

          Elections are won by getting your voters excited to vote for you. Republicans did, Democrats didn’t.

        • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Democrats have told voters for generations there are only 2 choices to vote for. They exercised another right, abstain. If the party thought trump was a serious threat they would have primaried the senile guy that refused to step down

          • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            They exercised another right, abstain.

            They should have voted and left the Presidential race empty on their ballots. All those down-ballotnstate and local races could have really made an impact. And strategists only care about the policy issues of likely voters.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Look. Everyone knows that there is nothing that Old White Rich Men want more than to elect a brown woman of asian descent. They HATE IT when you instead elect an Old White Rich (But Not Really) Man instead.

          Fight the power!!!