Trump gets the us economy to play with instead of jail. This tracks.
Poor puppy
Prisons are for separating people from society where they can do damage, they don’t have to be cruel
ok, but this is unsafe for the dog.
How so
That’s absolutely true, but they’re also for punishment and rehabilitation. Giving her access to a puppy in my eyes is the opposite of punishment, and she ain’t getting rehabilitated. This person destroyed thousands of lives if not more including those of children. This monster deserves zero sympathy and zero pleasures. The fact that she’s in a cushy prison is disgusting and wrong. There’s no justice for the countless victims and their families.
Could anything be done to her to make it right or to give justice to the victims?
I’d say no. So there’s no point in trying to do that. The only closure that can be given is the knowledge that she will never be able to hurt people again. Having a dog doesn’t change that.
With that logic then why is she in jail at all? If nothing can make it right or deliver justice then why lock her? Giving her comforts isn’t something that should be happening. For the love of me I cannot fathom why you’re defending a pedophile.
So she can’t cause further harm.
They shouldn’t be nice either. She committed real crimes and ruined the lives of dozens of women/girls. She shouldn’t get to play with puppies or touch the internet. She should be made to live the rest of her life working to apologize and make “right” whatever way possible.
I don’t see why that matters. No one can undo the damage she’s done least of all her. At this point she just needs to be separated from society. That in of itself is the punishment
Are professionally bred domesticated pet animals not a perk of being a part of society?
As long as it’s all offline or receive-only, should she also get any TV channels or blu-ray movies or game consoles she’s willing to pay for?
I’m not here to advocate for cruelty or dehumanizing people who have committed crimes. Just wondering about the thought process.
I bet for most people who aren’t “internationally infamous monster” level criminals, having a pet to care for could be a valuable part of rehabilitation. Maybe they could even take the pet with them after release to give them incentive to get up and go to work to support it.
In this case though, it’s all annoying because we have a very very bad person getting outrageously special treatment for the shadiest of reasons.
Is that why people are actually mad though? Because of the privilege that isnt being extended to other prisoners or because they want this person to suffer. I think it’s quite clear that they do perceive the injustice here being that she has a dog, not that other prisoners don’t have dogs.
Oh god please at least give her an adult dog? She’s played with enough “puppies”, has she not?
Of course she gets a puppy and not an adult dog.
What did the puppy do to deserve that?
Why is no one concerned about how unfair this is for the puppy?
there’s always someone concerned about this
It was this or send it home with Kristi Noem.
Unfair? It’s traded up the dog house for the big house.
That puppy is NOT safe.
I recall there being a specific rule with that prison program that barred her because her crimes were sexual in nature.
Egg on my face for assuming rules would apply to the President’s special lil’ child trafficker.
To be fair this presidency is showing the flaws in our system. Too much of our society is based on “rules” not law. A president can change the rules in an agency as long as they follow the law*. Basically congress needs to step up and codify many of these rules.
*That’s how it’s supposed to work, but you know Trump and the Supreme Court are not great
While I agree that we need more of the rules codified in law, the law hasn’t exactly stopped them from doing a lot of stuff either.
Re-read the comment. This was already addressed.
Either way when codified it will give power to a future administration to punish those that break the law if we ever get a president with the stomach for it
Business partner/coconspirator*
I hope the puppy is wearing a wire and catches her incriminating herself.
And then pees on her.
Doesn’t matter. They already have the evidence they need and aren’t releasing it.
This is to keep her from speaking publicly.
She’s already spoken and says Trump?, never heard of him
Just wait until Kristi Noem shows up.
She is raping that puppy.
Even if she isn’t you know everyone else in there is still going to think so.
Probably not, but the thing we should be angry about is that she’s getting comforts while being responsible for the ruination of so many lives.
This bestiality talk is just going to make the story disappear because nobody is going to pick it up.
I’m not concerned about basic comfort. That should be afforded every as rehabilitation, since she’s getting out, probably sooner than later. The issue is it’s not available to everyone, everyone else deals with retribution.
Good point.
She’s sexually abusing that puppy. Really.
I mean…. That’s probable.
Hasn’t she played with enough adolescent things?
