Thanks for the link. I’ve been wondering what immunity for “official” acts vs. not for “unofficial” acts really meant. Now I know that “unofficial” acts have not been defined yet because there hasn’t been a case brought before the SCOTUS to determine the difference.
What’s wild is that decision was during bidens term, so he could have “officially” declared Trump a terrorist and ordered a drone strike on him and it would take months to figure out whether he was allowed to do it.
Hey Supreme Court, can the President rob the country just by saying, “I officially order you to give me money”?
Justice Thomas: “Depends on how many RVs you buy me.”
If memory serves, Trump has a plane from Qatar he could gift to Thomas. It would probably look nice next to the corruption RV.
Thanks for the link. I’ve been wondering what immunity for “official” acts vs. not for “unofficial” acts really meant. Now I know that “unofficial” acts have not been defined yet because there hasn’t been a case brought before the SCOTUS to determine the difference.
What’s wild is that decision was during bidens term, so he could have “officially” declared Trump a terrorist and ordered a drone strike on him and it would take months to figure out whether he was allowed to do it.