Chat I think we’re in the bad place
YouTube removed a channel that was dedicated to posting AI-generated videos of women being shot in the head following 404 Media’s request for comment. The videos were clearly generated with Google’s new AI video generator tool, Veo, according to a watermark included in the bottom right corner of the videos.
The channel, named Woman Shot A.I, started on June 20, 2025. It posted 27 videos, had over 1,000 subscribers, and had more than 175,000 views, according to the channel’s publicly available data.
violence against women
All the videos posted by the channel follow the exact same formula. The nearly photo-realistic videos show a woman begging for her life while a man with a gun looms over her. Then he shoots her. Some videos have different themes, like compilations of video game characters like Lara Croft being shot, “Japanese Schoolgirls Shot in Breast,” “Sexy HouseWife Shot in Breast,” “Female Reporter Tragic End,” and Russian soldiers shooting women with Ukrainian flags on their chest.
“The AI I use is paid, per account I have to spend around 300 dollars per month, even though 1 account can only generate 8-second videos 3 times,” the channel’s owner wrote in a public post on YouTube. “So, imagine how many times I generate a video once I upload, I just want to say that every time I upload a compilation consisting of several 8-second clips, it’s not enough for just 1 account.”
Woman Shot A.I’s owner claimed they have 10 accounts. “I have to spend quite a lot of money just to have fun,” they said.
Note: My use of freaky is not negative at any point in this comment, it’s being used descriptively for kinks at the fringes.
I think you’re making the dangerous assumption that the only viewers are men. You could have written exactly the same question for content that is SA.
I could easily find you some women that love the idea of complete and total loss of control, complete and total dominance, complete and total masochism. Literal death is the absolute limit and there are definitely people who would be into that as a fantasy. The depiction we’re talking about (the AI slop) is crude and shit but that should not be relevant to whether snuff as a kink itself should be banned. The quality and legitimacy of AI doesn’t matter here.
Do you think there are no black women that are into asphyxiation or race play? I haven’t looked but this probably exists already and has freaky women who are into it and produce it. Should they be allowed to?
I think you have this idea that you’re only policing male sexuality with a lot of these arguments because you’re not thinking of women as independent sexual beings. The result of this thinking is that you don’t realise what you’re suggesting is policing women’s sexuality.
Women are into freaky shit too.
What about monsters? What about vampires sucking the life out of a woman until she goes limp and lifeless? What about werewolves and their tendency towards the same but through more explosively violent means? These are extremely common themes in women’s erotica and pornographic art depicting that erotica. Do we ban the art and not the erotica? Or do we ban the erotica too? Does that offend you less because you can pretend it doesn’t exist and nobody can just show you a picture/video to shock you? Millions of women read content with it, written by women!
Let’s flip the topic over. There is a very real opposing side to this. Freaky bloodletting is a real kink that people engage in, this is more often woman on male and sometimes (in the fantasy) involves the man bleeding to death. Should we ban that too? Does that offend you the same way?