Chat I think we’re in the bad place
YouTube removed a channel that was dedicated to posting AI-generated videos of women being shot in the head following 404 Media’s request for comment. The videos were clearly generated with Google’s new AI video generator tool, Veo, according to a watermark included in the bottom right corner of the videos.
The channel, named Woman Shot A.I, started on June 20, 2025. It posted 27 videos, had over 1,000 subscribers, and had more than 175,000 views, according to the channel’s publicly available data.
violence against women
All the videos posted by the channel follow the exact same formula. The nearly photo-realistic videos show a woman begging for her life while a man with a gun looms over her. Then he shoots her. Some videos have different themes, like compilations of video game characters like Lara Croft being shot, “Japanese Schoolgirls Shot in Breast,” “Sexy HouseWife Shot in Breast,” “Female Reporter Tragic End,” and Russian soldiers shooting women with Ukrainian flags on their chest.
“The AI I use is paid, per account I have to spend around 300 dollars per month, even though 1 account can only generate 8-second videos 3 times,” the channel’s owner wrote in a public post on YouTube. “So, imagine how many times I generate a video once I upload, I just want to say that every time I upload a compilation consisting of several 8-second clips, it’s not enough for just 1 account.”
Woman Shot A.I’s owner claimed they have 10 accounts. “I have to spend quite a lot of money just to have fun,” they said.
So if someone puts up a bunch of clips from movies of people being killed should we take those down too?
How long does a clip have to be before it crosses the threshold from being snuff to being a movie scene? What other criteria must it meet?
I mean this seriously. Because this is a very real barrier you’re going to run into when dealing with this. I assume you don’t want to prevent killing people from being in any movie or tv show?.. Maybe you do?.. Do you? Real question again. I don’t know and I want to clarify this is not an argument, I’m not really judging or anything. I’m sincerely engaging.
EDIT: Oh and we have to talk about videogame killing too after the above questions I guess.
there’s no way to know if the AI used acting movie scenes or actual snuf, it could’ve scraped a police body cam video of a woman getting shot who can’t consent to being in the AI hallucination slop
That’s a genuinely horrifying thought. One that should be used to stop AI from mass scraping their content or force them into some degree of transparency about what content they train on.
Just going off the thumbnails the article saved, it looks like schlocky B-movie effects. In particular it looks a whole lot like the famous head explosion from Scanners.
and a few years ago will smith was eating spaghetti from his eyes
That’s nothing, you should’ve seen what he was doing in AI footage
My point was it looks like it’s drawing on a specific sort of dramatic movie effect that’s nicely in focus in the center of a shot, rather than the comparatively subdued or indistinct effects that real footage would impart.