What? She was a fantastic candidate! The fact she lost to someone so obviously bad just means she was bad at communicating to dumb voters. This is a widely known problem with Americans and you can’t blame her for that. So you see, she was the best person to not get the job. /s

They identify with wealth and power. People who have that are their people.

Giving people a pass for being intolerant is writing off the people they are being intolerant towards. And if you actually care about those intolerant people you would shun them in the hope they recognize their mistake instead of coddling them like they’re incapable of being an adult.

Prison is for poor people who could not hire a better lawyer or buy a judge.

They ain’t raping their fellow rich kin. This shit is classist, they don’t view the poor as people to be respected.

“You might be right about me but you’re still wrong”

Edit: it seems you don’t understand what I mean by being right vs doing good. I agree, language is hard.

Trump was willing to starve the hostage, they were not. Simple as.

Ehh, maybe Pete will take some notes from Mamdani and stay on a populus economic message and resist the culture war stuff.

I think he’s saying Mayo Pete runs for preserving the status quo?

Filed his under: Americans are more concerned with being proven right than what is good.

The general attitude of the people in China disagrees. I guess we can try to tell them we know better as we strip civil society down and burn the rest.

Only a matter of time before someone takes his AI clip of Don taking a shit on a city and turn it into a diaper commercial.

If you’re expecting bad times to educate misinformed voters then you’re going to be sorely disappointed.

… Because China is working to benefit their civilization. When that ceases to be the case their people will stop listening.

Not sure how to feel about this, people were going hungry and planes were being stopped. Yes there is nothing stopping the GOP from doing this again, but it’s mostly a charade already - they could have abolished the filibuster and got what they wanted anyways.

The Dems have this attitude that if the people suffer enough they will learn they were wrong for not voting for them, but it feels like ground hog’s day with that strategy because misinformed people always learn the wrong lesson. At the end of the day it’s more important for our leaders to do good than to prove they were right.

Edit: It seems food stamps were back on, so now I’m just pissed they wasted everyone’s time and energy.

Outwardly sure, they will talk nice. But they aren’t going to do any favors for the man.

He goes on fox news and says he didn’t lie and that the judge lied about his admission. Crazy.

Fair point. I wanted to call out how voters asking for better candidates is not voter apathy. Not that people who are apathetic to democracy don’t need to be challenged.

I’m talking about this bill in particular:

https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/10/school-antisemitism-bill-signed/

Then later he gets asked about the AIPAC money he receives and he responds “well that’s interesting you ask that” as if the question itself is antisemitic. https://youtu.be/SB-C6QeNyHw

listen to him talk about the students that have been protesting the genocide, he casts it as antisemitic.