

Huh. Pretty sure I just described a process, no predictions present, but I guess if you’re going to kneejerk call everyone an idiot then you’re not going to let little things like reading or thinking before you speak get in the way.
Huh. Pretty sure I just described a process, no predictions present, but I guess if you’re going to kneejerk call everyone an idiot then you’re not going to let little things like reading or thinking before you speak get in the way.
You suspend or terminate one deal, and then go into fresh negotiations with something else you want - e.g. stop the genocide, and we’ll trade with you again. Isn’t that how it works?
Well, the original bill itself wouldn’t have been written with this in mind, but the update was definitely written in such a way that it applies to everyone but can be used against prisoners as well.
These are the kind of activities typically covered under “outfitting” in U.S. law:
So I think in addition to fighting fires, they basically want to replace the park rangers they fired with prisoners.
I believe they’re referring to the fact that prisoners have been used in firefighting efforts, but they’re still subject to minimum wage and maximum hours laws when they do that work. With this amendment they could be paid nothing and thrown at fires with no rest until their bodies give out.
No argument with any of that from me bud. My hopes were high for Labour after so many years of the Tories, but they’re not acquitting themselves in any way I admire since they got in. It seems like anyone truly progressive is actually unelectable in the UK.