skeletorsass [she/her]

DRM on it so can not even make a local duplicate. US was very mad about Iran F-14.

MADL and networking of F-35 is not so special. Can be installed on other plane or use similar system. A lot is marketing. Bandwidth is higher compare with link 16 but principle is the same only more data. Rafale use link 16 for sensor fusion capability. SM-6 data link is also link 16.

Link 16 time resolution is not sufficient for hypersonic weapon. Is not directional signal. There is other downside but Saab can find a good data link before plane arrive in 20 years

I found one

Buy those cheap model and use it until it is dead

This tell us NATO view of J-35. No reason to guard F-35 technology

Test was 50mt because it is not practical to test full power. Too much fallout and danger. Design was understood.

Rare earth problem I think. Or took his medication twice.

Component of one yes. Can disassemble. Do not know information exactly but system is like HQ-9 made of several different type of vehicle I think. Each part can have a lot or small number. More radar truck have more coverage. More launcher truck can kill more. Command vehicle can coordinate. Y-20 can carry HQ-9 vehicle, IL-76 is bigger.

More likely supply or upgrade for S-300VM system.

Can not gain much intelligence. Principle of operation for S-300 is known already to all. Specific detail of radar and missile could be learned but not simply from looking. Must reverse engineer with Egypt knowing. Then will only learn this information for export radar and export missile.

My field of work! It is sad because there is cheaper options available than this one which are more easy for Russia to get but I think the Russian developer only know how to work with Nvidia developer environment.

This is why Nvidia succeed. Other hardware option are competitive but do not use the proprietary Nvidia toolchain all the buy in.

Enemies do not have a lot of air power. A bomb is more effective if you can drop it.

It will be very difficult. Hole is not very large at opening compared with bomb and bomb will lose a lot of energy if it impact the side.

Claim of 60 meters reinforced concrete. Reinforced concrete is much weaker than rock. Penetration most likely less than 40m rock. Number even then very optimistic because it is almost marketing.

🫏❤️

Concrete bunker short distance under city block is a different task compare with deep rock. Much more easy to compromise structural integrity.

Can not work. Each bomb would have to land inside hole from previous. Would take many many. Penetrator is mostly kinetic. It would work very badly with solid rock.

Ambulance? Shelter? Both are a military target according to

My information on this bomb suggest that it is likely not sufficient for many facility. Capability is overstated and very overstated for rock penetration. Rock is very difficult to defeat.

Eat burger. Commit war crime. Die in ambush.