Peacepath

Yes, transphobia can be used against anyone, even against cis gender transphobes!

There is no way to both prove one is not a trans and keep their dignity. And even sacrifying their dignity, it could still be called fake, AI-forged, or make their opponent claim that they are a closeted egg trans.

Which makes that cis gender transphobes should take position against transphobia.

(And even if that is not against her, and I recognize trans women are women, I really think JKR is a trans woman ^^)

Give them an history book about the class strugle in the United States ; workers union, strikes… American knew how to fight for their rights. Some of them surely still know.

Who ever wins, trans will only have rights in the US if they keep fight for it. So the question isn’t who make the best promises before the vote, but who is the most likely to accept to negociate after.

If his aim is to enforce a fully protectionist policy for the US, and therefore make sure to degrade all partnerships, he is near success.

His claims all seems to go for isolationism and to bring back the situation as before the first world war… a country neutral and not involved in international business, where the richests are empowered as lords.

Here, he knows Europe won’t give away its strategic stock. If he blocates trade with Europe, it would be on the two ways. And he may claim that it is Europe’s fault, while making a big step toward isolationism.

Not exactly… historically, democracy is a system where random citizen are called at power for a given time, and then face a trial where people may condemn them to death if they did shit (or claim they are heroes if they did good). At least that is how Athena’s democracy worked.

The new democratic claim is that people choose a head, and then the head can do whatever without face any consequences. Choose your tyran.

US, European countries, Soviet Union and North Korea aren’t really democratic systems, even if they claim so.