

They won’t next time when there’s dozens with that shirt. They’ll just make up a reason if they have to.
They won’t next time when there’s dozens with that shirt. They’ll just make up a reason if they have to.
The birth doesn’t even have any relevance to be part of a royal family. I might remember this wrong, but last time I was in Stockholm I went to the armoury museum or whatever its called. There was a small tidbit almost hidden in some big paragraph about a Swedish royal who had no kids and therefore no heir. He went ahead and just adopted a random French general (I think) who then by extension became a real royal person.
I actually just looked it up now, it was a Swedish king who had no children, adopted this French guy, who then became Swedish king himself: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_XIV_John
So from then on the Swedish royal family wasn’t technically Swedish anymore? I didn’t check who he married and had kids with though.
Yeah but… that still doesn’t answer what the actual intention of a pose like that is. Like, for the make-up to showcase the nice lines and flow of it, OK. But for Swatch? It’s dark and you have to squint, like what is that even for?
I don’t think anyone would picture that the arm goes into the shoulder but rather…
It’s Bob Vylan. Why oh why are these guys writing those articles but leaving out the band name from the damn headline. “A band did this”, “Singer did that”. They name them in the article but jeez. Just put it in the title!
Actually a nice example that no one should be above the law. But done in the most idiotic and dangerous way possible. Also the fine is probably a drop in a bucket for this guy.