

Yes, I know. You didn’t answer my question, still. So, I assume you’re not discussing in.good faith.


Yes, I know. You didn’t answer my question, still. So, I assume you’re not discussing in.good faith.


That question wasn’t to me.


Sorry, you didn’t answer my question, so I’m not going to engage with yours.


So you agree that if there is a collective bias against people if colour, it is harmful?


The movie was satirical hyperbole, though. If it was played as genuine, not in a comedy, it would ruin the film.


Ah, ok. You haven’t read the article. They risk losing an election, as they use social media for self promotion and messaging. If theban twitter, they risk other being able to take their lead and they only have a small margin.


They could ban grok and fine Twitter.


No, this is traffic coming from google. Instead, they are using ai snippets to stop people going to websites. So, basically, stealing content. This is one area it might actually benefit the consumer, when accurate, a big if. However, they do it to keep people on their site, not to benefit the consumer.


Or easy to band them together?


It’s not that they don’t do anything to help it. They actively try to sabotage it.


When the problem is that your jusges are too political, making it more political seems like the wrong move.


They don’t get credit for it when they were pressured to do it by their customers. They made a financial decision not a moral one.


It’s not dirt. It’s death threats. Marjorie Taylor Green didn’t play nice with trump for 2 minutes and then quit politics as she got scared of the far right reaction.


Yes. There are stats on how protests of a certain size always leads to change. Voting works. Protests work.
They will try to make protests unattractive. Making them illegal or violent. Either from within or from armed forces. Of they do it wrong, they generate more support. If they do it how they want, they suppress resistance and/or start a civil war that allows them to stop elections.


If they play their cards too quickly, they have less support. If they can gradually ramp up fear of resistance, they have a better chance of succeeding. Too slow, they get voted out. Too fast, they might get too much resistance from people, including those in uniform.
The fact that they are doing school raids the day after murdering someone means they are ramping up pretty quick. The fact that nobody protesting has been killed means they are not ramping up as quickly as some expected.


Lol, no they don’t. While talking about the dangers of covid vaccines, all of fox news and the maga politicians were getting vaccinated. Trump had experiment treatments for it.


I’d be looking at their recent declaration about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Cut them where it hurts his chances in the mod terms. Affordability all the way. He’s very much a let them eat cake kind of guy. But with big Macs.


When tariffs came in, I was hopeful they realised, finally, that they were dealing with a madman. However, they still negotiate as if he’s a rational actor. Express concern etc. Just like the Dems in the USA. He pays no heed to their comments or concerns. He only responds to power.
Tariff the shit out of USA tech. Stop buying USA weapons. Start allowing Ukraine to attack inside Russia. Cut off their supply of precious metals by working with Australia and Denmark (Greenland).
Show them you mean business by reducing tariffs on china in return for Chinese concessions. Start really penalisong any European or American companies that still do business in Russia.
Its mind boggling that they are doing practically nothing concrete.


Which is the point of a united Europe. They should work together.
He wasn’t joking.