5·
6 days agoThe Economist has a similar standard: https://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/pdfs/style_guide_12.pdf (see the ‘pronounceable abbreviations’ section, for instance)
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: October 1st, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
That’s the Guardian’s house style for acronyms: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/51924/proper-capitalization-of-commonly-used-acronyms-and-initialisms
Reported in the New York Times: <https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/04/05/world/iran-war-trump-news
Please don’t post things like this. There’s enough hype and disinformation floating around the internet already.
I will not dignify the article with a click, but in the spirit of countering spammy clickbait with facts, I surmise that the piece is referring to NASA’s spectacular new images of Nebula PMR 1 via JWST: https://science.nasa.gov/missions/webb/nasas-webb-examines-cranium-nebula/
Oh, for God’s sake, Sydney Morning Herald. Just say China, not this clickbait tackiness!
(No offense intended to the poster, who’s just reposting the article).