I mean, some of protesters seemed a bit nuts? Quote: „ RFK kills people with AIDS“ - Where does that make sense?

The Cohen Part seemed more reasonable.

Well, that is Not how it happenend. Nancy Faser announced it publicly. If you are waiting for the review, you dont do that…

Look I am all for marking extremist, but it really matters on what grounds. And it matters how it is done.

Why is the report Not public? Does Not make any sense.

Why has the report not undergone internal audits as it would be standard procedure? Seems odd at least.

Its really all about „Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence“ - and no it does not matter if you personally think „it is obvious“.

Based on what I have read, hence based on what is known about the content of the report, there is no good evidence (but I could be wrong). Also no legal implications follow from this report, and based on what is known about Nancy Faeser involvment I can not deny a certain „Geschmäckle“ which is undermining the original purpose.

If you wanna do these things, they need to be done with undeniable evidence and transparency.

While you can argue that Individuals in the AfD are antidemocratic, I honestly do not see evidence for that on the general party level.

I read their program. Weird? Yes. Antidemocratic? No.

i hope i live to see a 50% decrease in human population

What kind of person are you?

What people on this thread dont realize. It seems like what they did was quite more severe than just calling a police officer a fascist.

Translated:

An attempt was made to drag employees out of offices; the attackers were “also masked and armed with axes, saws, crowbars and clubs”. Six-figure property damage was caused

Source (German)