

Anyone using ‘blood libel’ is clearly insane.


Anyone using ‘blood libel’ is clearly insane.


He randomly brought it up like 2 times, and none of them were this week. He’s already forgotten about it.


Looks fake. This guy is known for spreading propaganda.


False equivalency. Not ending wars fast enough is not the same thing as Trump literally starting a war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_United_States_troops_from_Afghanistan_(2011–2016)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_United_States_troops_from_Iraq_(2007–2011)
Where is the page about Trump announcing a withdrawal from Iran? When that page exists, maybe then you can call them equivalent. Until then, it’s a bad faith argument.


Feels like a bad faith argument. Obama probably shouldn’t have won a peace prize, most people agree with that. But he was not responsible for Iraq and Afghanistan the way that Trump directly caused the current conflict. While he continues to lie about it in the news every day.


Ah yes, the president will be behind a paywall. Democracy.


Ending a war, even one that he himself began, is still something that’s potentially “peace prize eligible.” I’m willing to give him a pat on the back if he actually does something right. He won’t though.


“They have a reputation for maybe not giving it to people like me.”
You mean people actively involved in war? Yeah. If you stopped the war tomorrow maybe you’d be eligible.
Chef’s kiss
His eyes range from magnificent to derpy depending on the picture. He’s a bit bug eyed.
“I voted for the evil orange turd because of abortion, but turns out I should have cared about other issues too.”