there were several congressional acts which pushed for independent analysis to get to the truth of these matters.

It’s wild to imagine the U.S. congress actually promoting independent scientific research. I wish I lived in a world like that.

And if you went around distributing it without clearly informing of it’s THC/CBD ratio and the implications thereof?

Say you’ve never been to a legal dispensary without saying you’ve never been to a legal dispensary.

I’ve been to cannabis dispensaries in five different states. Never have I ever seen anything sold without clear labeling of the THC/CBD ratio (as well as listing percentages of various other terpenes), but also every container features a warning about health risks. The high potency products I’ve bought all contain labels that specifically highlight their strength, and warn about an increased risk of psychosis.

Yeah, it would be nice if there could be more specific information on the labels, or a unified authority across the US to enforce standards across states. Unfortunately, anti-cannabis zealots have done well to hold back research by keeping cannabis illegal, while simultaneously using lack of research as a reason for keeping it illegal.

I second your position. I’m a recreational user, but my girlfriend has chronic pain and a medical card. If we take the same dosage, I can be halfway to my limit while she’s only just starting to feel a high. If only low-potency cannabis were available, I can’t imagine the dosages she’d have to consume. If it were too weak, it wouldn’t be an option for her at all.

At least with high-potency cannabis, she is able to avoid opioids, which would be far more dangerous for her.