I mean, I have to say, so far in the running she seems to be the one that’s at least trying to gather support from the left of the party, rather than distancing herself as far from us as possible. With the current leaders like Gavin Newsome, who’s desperately trying to throw us under the bus, backing the billionares, and harris who’s feeling that her 2024 failure was because she was too far left.
So yeah she’s a flawed candidate, but so far I haven’t seen a better option yet.
Well worth noting, been a long time since I was a fundimentalist who read the bible… and the left behind books, but if I recall a pretty significant difference in the anti-christ before and after the antichrist makes it’s miraculous recovery in revelation 13.
In short it’s hard to really define the “fatal wound to the head” that the bible describes. IE could be the assasination, could be the election loss in 2020… could be the 42 fellony convictions. Point is if you were looking for something to match prophetically, trump has over performed that. But anyway point is after that the antichrist kind of goes into overdrive. Some interpretations have it as that’s when he comes into full power, or that’s when he’s emboldened and doesn’t need to play politics as much so he can accelerate everything.
So… he’s trying the put powerful direct sunlight into the body to cure covid? Is there a syringe of bleach in the back pocket of the tourniquet.
are war crimes enforced period? I mean there’s been what 2 small countries prosecuted for war crimes since WW2, and a couple of world leaders walking around with arrest warrants on their heads that don’t really seem to be affected by it anyway.
I mean in rational views… the police and DOJ can’t be trusted, the story still has a lot of oddities in it, the text messages seem staged as hell, whether that being Robinson going out of his way to actively clear his roomate, or the police just forging messages.
That being said I haven’t seen anything that seems to contradict the idea that Robinson himself, was opposed to Kirk’s hate mongering, and took the shot for that reason.
Honestly I can’t disagree. Trumps behavior is american conservatism going back to Nixon/Reagan probably further. The biggest difference is as society advanced. Conservatives had to water things down, find convoluted excuses to do these things. Trump just goes out and does it all. Doesn’t even try to mask it “oh yeah we’re attacking because we want the oil”.
Keep crypto scams going! Also trump doesn’t know policy anyway, he just signs what his handlers ask him to.
Would say overall the point is… they aren’t more expensive than regular food, depending on your situation etc… Key thing is crab legs and lobster tails, aren’t generally a huge price point beyond other things… and the joke, is of course that someone using their 200 a month and getting something moderately paletable, while a small group of cabinet members are literally spending more than… well more than a states worth of food stamp recipients get total.
Sure, but did you think about the fact that food stamp recepiants could legally buy frozen lobster tail if they hoose to use all of their food stamps on it?, there’s at least one documented case of someone actually doing it too so, it’s a serious problem and justified cutting off half the country from food stamps to keep the epstien files from releasing.
Well I think Schumer may be more UNIVERSALLY hated, because he sucks for both sides. If you think tax cuts for the rich are great, that Isreal should be able to do whatever the hell it wants, that wars are a good thing, you’ll love McConnel, Schumer on the other hand sometimes says words to pretend to oppose those things.
So in short, if you are pro-fascist you hate schumer a little, if you are anti-fascist you hate schumer a lot… but at the end of the day, no one likes him, except for maybe the people that support his role as the person hired to lose.
Which, some how the Dodge waste fraud and abuse team, never seemed to get around to investigating… They claimed they would, but I guess were too busy gutting everything that was investigating musks companies before getting bored with it.
Also I do have to worry quite a bit, Didn’t both epstien, and one of his victims make very similar statements, before they supposedly killed themselves. Admitted I guess with more public visibility that MTG and Massie have when they did theirs, and the much increased attention of the public on the matter, it should be impossible to kill either of them without multiplying the public suspision by a factor of 100.
Usually, conspiracy theories feed on an absence of information, not a glut. But the Justice Department’s release of more than three million pages, 2,000 videos and 180,000 images has done little to smother baseless speculation or fabrication.
Well duh… it’s still the absenses. It’s just the glut is highlighting what’s intentionally removed.
If I’m reporting a robbery of my convenience store. if I said I had no security camera footage of the event… that’s a little weird.
If I report a robbery, and I do have security footage, but there’s a mysterious black bar over the robbers face… you might think it’s an inside job.
I wish democrats had a spine and a sense of humor… I’d say “OK I’ll take the unfreeze and I promise to name the airport after you, put it in writing and we will do this deal”.
then announce the new “Trump is in the Epstein files” airport.
am I missing something though, I’m assuming there’s like 18 democrats inn that committee so, what good does giving them the monopoly on questions on anything that matters.
don’t they actually have something like that in russia, like their top hockey team has to fake losing to putin like he’s a make a wish kid?
Edit: found video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgbI55HdqQs
What’s the official rules on what they can share? Like could Ro Khanna do like a AMA where we give him page numbers… solid targetted list of
“OK so who messaged epstien about the littlest girl being very naughty”, who all were the co-conspirators listed on page X, etc…
Is that information considered classified he’d go to jail for it? I mean technically everythings supposed to have been released from the get go…
Because we honestly, we’ve seen more than enough to know heads need to roll, hell we can point to so many points in the files where we can see specific people that’s heads should be rolling where we just lack the names.
Well yeah who couldn’t think unpredictability is long term a huge problem, especially when it comes to “deal making” above all things. IE you start with the “we’ll give him what he asks for or he might attack us”, but 1. that encourages everyone to eventually co-operate to get the bully in check… also it wears thinner when you don’t respect deals you’ve already made. Your unpredictable enough and “give me $1 or I nuke your country”, simple request, but if your unpredictability is high enough… they’ve got no reason to think you won’t nuke them even if you give the dollar… hell actually more reason to think possibly the opposite, maybe your possesion of the dollar is the only reason he hasn’t nuked you already.
Only if he stepped well outside what he was supposed to be doing, and looked at and/or had his goons look at a lot of classified information that they had neither the security clearance, nor the need to know to access.
So in short, yes.
We only want to support aggressors in wars. if you want the US’s help, you need to 1. already have a nuke, 2. drop the first bomb.