

I always switch to hypotheticals “Does that mean…?” or I put words in their mouths “So clearly Hakeem Jeffries will also be calling for…”
If it’s veiled in JAQing off or lib-style smuglord irony it doesn’t attract too much serious attention imo. I doubt a judge is gonna listen to any charges brought against you because you asked a hypothetical to highlight the hypocrisy of Jeffries’ position or because you said something ironic online.
The last line I put in the top comment is completely unnecessary though.


I have zero proof of this but the timing of the corruption scandal and the way it took some of Zelensky’s biggest allies off the board, ones who he worked closely with and who were high up in his administration, right when Trump was putting pressure on Ukraine to sign a peace deal as US support was really drying up feels very coincidental in its timing.
I have no evidence to support this but I’d be flabbergasted if Ukrainian intelligence wasn’t working hand in glove with the US intelligence apparatus, same for the corruption watchdog.
It feels likely that they have plenty of dirt on Zelensky and they’re positioning to get him out of the picture by isolating him from his powerful allies and now installing their own into the upper echelons of his administration.
I think Budanov has been tapped to become the next president, one who will work in lockstep with the US, who will assume the role if Zelensky isn’t compliant enough with US demands or if there’s a popular uprising due to war weariness.
I bet you Zelensky will flee to Israel, or at least he will attempt to, under a second wave of the corruption scandal right when there are protests or there’s a peak in discontent for whatever reason, (e.g. when the government has left Kiev without electricity for over two weeks and the people have had enough of it.)