I would not recommend engaging with law enforcement in the USA.
If they ask you a question, you are on very risky ground. Not answering can be considered interfering with an investigation. Answering and getting it wrong, even accidentally, can get you convicted of lying to the police.
Or cops could just be having a bad day and decide to execute you for no reason.
The Palestinian genocide is produced by the policies of an American who has been an academic for 40 years? 🤔
Garber said that “a great deal” of what had initially been labeled antisemitism was ultimately anti-Israeli bias, which he called “insidious and maybe more corrosive of University life.”
The Israeli government deliberately confounds anti-Zionist and anti-Jewish sentiments. They do it to make criticizing their actions more difficult, but ultimately they put Jewish safety at risk because all Jews become targets, regardless of whether they support Zionism or not. 😞
The current right wing thinking in the USA is that Europe only cares about renewables since it has no fossil fuels. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The right wing in America kept trying to pass anti-abortion laws for decades even though they were obviously unconstitutional, and here we are…
I mean, people in a town I lived in were upset because kids from the next town over were using the public swimming pool. This was in northern Virginia, so not liking people from another village anywhere in the world hardly seems strange.
Not the death panels I was expecting, but somehow still unsurprising.
Good. Then a less predatory business can fill the niche left empty.
He spent $120 million on ads for himself. Imagine what good could have been done with that money instead. 😞
Yeah I think this video confuses some theoretical version of Islam versus the actual version. Like Christians who ignore the actual practice of the faith and point to the parts of the Bible about love and joy.
FWIW, I see the same.
Trump doesn’t care about purse strings. Maybe the next Democrat should try just helping the people in spite of the Congress and Supreme Court?
Hold it… are all of these government workers being paid to go to a prayer meeting? 🤔
The 17th Amendement requires the direct election of Senators. Blue state accept red states’ votes for those.
If you’re going to make an argument based on bad faith of states, then the US basically ceases to exist as a republic, regardless of whether you have the compact.
I think maybe you misunderstood the compact.
I’m your example, the states who signed the compact would all put their votes to candidate Y, assuming they had more popular votes in all states.
It’s not “join us or be punished”, it’s “we will implement the will of the majority, not matter what”.
Supreme Court: “Not like that.”
Nobody gets disenfranchised. Rather this compact enables the radical idea of “one person, one vote”.
It’s not completely pseudo-science, as there are a lot of correlations with things like academic success or job performance:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient#Social_correlations
deleted by creator