

From my perspective this wasn’t a ‘luck’ situation.
A criminal assaulted a crowd of people with explosives. It’s just a coincidence that the criminal is a cop in this case. It’s not ‘unlucky’ that they were assaulted.


From my perspective this wasn’t a ‘luck’ situation.
A criminal assaulted a crowd of people with explosives. It’s just a coincidence that the criminal is a cop in this case. It’s not ‘unlucky’ that they were assaulted.


You seem to be missing the part where they threw an explosive into a crowd of people.


Ironically Asian powers are the only ones that seem to know what they’re doing these days.
America & European leaders have lost their damn minds


I know all the polling indicates a blue wave but I’m worried people are getting over confident about it :/. I’m hoping it’s as intense as people are assuming but I’m expecting for them to barley take the majority and still need to bargain on every issue,


Even the implied accusation is pretty weak.
So he went to a game in the same city where a person you could have plausibly conspired with lives? Like a major sporting event which it is common to travel for?
If he is banned from traveling to any city where a potential conspirator exists then that rules out basically every city in the US, certainly DC is included in that list.
Owned opposition. The fact that the majority of Americans view the democratic party as left leaning (or worse, “radically left”) is among the greater information issue our society faces.


Man being punched in the face told to simply make a deal with the person punching him.


But is “oligarchy” truly an accurate name for the enemy?
Yes. Full stop - yes. A few hundred extremely rich people having massive influence over the society is an oligarchy and calling it anything else is imprecise.


I really wish there was a form of political aptitude tests that didn’t have all the problems voting tests inevitably have. The ones most against socialism are generally the ones that understand it the least.
The first time had enough plausible deniability that he meant it in a “See what happens” type of way.
I still think that is the most reasonable interpretation of his statements but he’s intentionally playing into the media to keep the debate going. Letting people hear what they want to hear; Those that want to believe he meant the bad version (either because they like the message; or want to be mad about it) will hear that way. Those that want to believe he meant the innocent version will believe that.
It’s just very sick. What a disgusting terrorist.