That’s not how contractors necessarily work. What often happens is the contract goes to the lowest bidder, but it’s still more than it would take to pay a direct hire. The person doing the job is probably paid less, but the shareholders pocket the difference between what they bid and what they’ll pay their employees. They’re basically the landlords of labor.
Or at least say that it’s worth it to own the libs
What do you think it means?
Well there’s multiple people saying he says “or” and about an equal number thinking he said “but” so I’d say it’s open to interpretation. With anyone else I’d give them the benefit of the doubt, but with Rump, the worst way he could have meant it is probably the most accurate
Edit: Welp, I just listened to it and he clearly said “or”, so you’re full of shit or need your hearing checked
I hope the next time the MAGAts throw an insurrection the Capitol Police just retreat to wherever the Democrats are barricaded, and let the mob do whatever it wants to the GOP fuckwads
Did you listen to the audio yourself?
You’d have to prove you weren’t hired due to your views, and while they are morons, they’re probably not dumb enough to outright say that’s the reason they didn’t hire you. They’ll find something else on which to base their decision